<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Table maintenance without SM30 Access in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763346#M37225</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I can see, VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL only checks S_TABU_* authorization objects. Check twice. Do an authorization trace (ST01 or STAUTHTRACE). Etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But why do you want to get around the SM30 authorization, it sounds like no sense... If one user needs to maintain a table, give him a role with SM30 + other authorizations to limit to given tables...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sandra_Rossi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-11T09:10:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Table maintenance without SM30 Access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763344#M37223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Experts,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Req : Without SM30 access, need to maintain ( create entries/edit/ display) table. &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Note : I have referred all existing threads which suggests tcode for SM30 and FM VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I have tried both. But both are asking for SM30 access when i see SU53. Is it possible? Am i missing anything?Pls suggest possible ways.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:25:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763344#M37223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T07:25:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Table maintenance without SM30 Access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763345#M37224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ishwarya,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you try maintaining the delivery class as C and Data Browser/Table View Maint. as Display / Maintenance Allowed, in Delivery and Maintenance Tab of SE11.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That will let us maintain the entries from SE11 itself.Not necessary that we need to have TMG.TMG is required if you want the data to be maintained by the User itself as the User will not be having access to SE11.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K.Kiran.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:07:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763345#M37224</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiran_k8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T08:07:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Table maintenance without SM30 Access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763346#M37225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I can see, VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL only checks S_TABU_* authorization objects. Check twice. Do an authorization trace (ST01 or STAUTHTRACE). Etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But why do you want to get around the SM30 authorization, it sounds like no sense... If one user needs to maintain a table, give him a role with SM30 + other authorizations to limit to given tables...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763346#M37225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandra_Rossi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T09:10:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Table maintenance without SM30 Access</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763347#M37226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why do you want to bypass authority-check?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/table-maintenance-without-sm30-access/m-p/763347#M37226</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaymondGiuseppi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-11T14:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

