<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Lock Object in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884716#M371218</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just change the Lock mode to SHARED i mean S mode and do that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Sudheer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-01T17:42:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884714#M371216</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      we have a transaction Code Zxo09 this Report Changes the address of the storage location of a particular plant.now the problem is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;suppose i execute the program with plant =1400 and Storage location =1000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i get the edit option and after clicking on the edit push button.ie now we can edit...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now let us open another session and run the same  program entering DIFFERENT  plant and DIFFERENT storage location . wht it say' s is it gives a pop up window say 'use xxx is locked" which should not happen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in fact there is a table xxx which is getting updated .ie the table is locked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i don't know the solution but friend say , the TABLE LEVEL LOCKING HAS TO BE BROUGHT DOWN TO RECORD LEVEL LOCKING.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but i don't know how to do that ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lock mode is :E&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please suggest some thing it's very urgent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Murali g.s.a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884714#M371216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-01T17:39:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884715#M371217</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are updating configuration entries..or SM30..It will lock the whole table..Which means only one user can update the table..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the disadvantage of using SM30 for maintaining entries..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution could be to create a custom transaction that will give access to record by record...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:42:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884715#M371217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-01T17:42:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884716#M371218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just change the Lock mode to SHARED i mean S mode and do that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Sudheer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884716#M371218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-01T17:42:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884717#M371219</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems  in the report, you have locking all enties in the table using lock object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so try to lock only the particular plant and sotrage location, by passing values to lock obejct (FM).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;let me know if is not working well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nagaraju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nagaraju.pnr@rediffmail.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884717#M371219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-02T04:52:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884718#M371220</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Naren,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               u r solution i think will slove my problem , but , i don't know how to lock the object at record level can u please guide me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with creating f.m and so on ........... i know it's bit tedious but please.........&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks for your answer hope this support continues till the problem get's solved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;murali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:02:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884718#M371220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-02T09:02:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884719#M371221</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Naren,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; i think the problem is getting cleared wht u said is correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;they are two maintainance view tables which are doing this job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now wht i want to know is if i develop a customised f.m &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if will not  effect the data mainatined in SM30.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;awaiting for your reply,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Murali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884719#M371221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-02T09:32:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lock Object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884720#M371222</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks the problem is solved with a simple change from E to S.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks Sudheer .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;murali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/lock-object/m-p/1884720#M371222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-02T14:52:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

