<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SAP table view performance in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724064#M315794</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Rob... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We aren't inserting data in the view.  Actually the view is for a BW data load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Calvin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-02T17:52:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAP table view performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724062#M315792</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear friends,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a table view with two tables inner joined and each table has more than 30 million records.  It gets time out every time when trying a full load, even in batch mode the temp table got full and throw and short dump.  Any good idea to improve the performance?  Would indexing the join key be helpful?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Calvin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:14:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724062#M315792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T17:14:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP table view performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724063#M315793</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've never tried to insert data into a view, but if you must do it this way, then yes you have to have an index on the join fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But why don't you just load the tables individually?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724063#M315793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T17:32:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP table view performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724064#M315794</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Rob... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We aren't inserting data in the view.  Actually the view is for a BW data load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Calvin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724064#M315794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T17:52:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP table view performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724065#M315795</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, you should still join on index fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;30 million records will take time to load. I doubt if the load is dumping (in background) because of that. It's more likely running the rollback segment out of space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any event, try loading in smaller chunks with a commit in between chunks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-table-view-performance/m-p/1724065#M315795</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T17:59:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

