topic BOPF - io_modify->create in Application Development and Automation Discussions

BOPF - io_modify->create

fabio_bellocchio — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:23:27 GMT

Dear BOPF experts.

I could not find solution for this issue by searching in this community

I am creating a sub-node in the Yard Order application. The record is child of Yard Order root record. Creation is made by means of CREATE method of the /BOBF/IF_FRW_MODIFY class, implemented in the /BOBF/IF_FRW_ACTION~EXECUTE method of my custom BOPF Action.

CALL METHOD io_modify->create

EXPORTING iv_node = /sapyl/if_yard_order_c=>sc_node-reference
iv_key = <lfs_ref_data>-key
is_data = lo_ref_data
iv_assoc_key = /sapyl/if_yard_order_c=>sc_association-reference-to_parent
iv_source_node_key = is_ctx-node_key
iv_source_key = ls_key-key
iv_root_key = is_ctx-root_node_key

IMPORTING
ev_key = lv_key.

Apparently, the creation works well.

However, I can not figure out why the registry is written in read-only (dimmed) mode. When a line is created manually by pressing the "Create" button on the screen, the new line is activated for changes. But when I do this with the implementation, it comes in read only mode. I tried many things, but nothing worked.

Please, can someone give me a tip on what could be happening here?

Thank you.

Re: BOPF - io_modify->create

gabriel_candrian — Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:36:14 GMT

Hi Fabio

As i can see in your code sample, you pass the root node key (is_ctx-root_node_key) of your BOPF object model instead of the root key of the corresponding entity you are working on int the action (in your case this probably should be ls_key-root_key instead). Maybe this is the cause of your problem.

Regards
Gabriel

Re: BOPF - io_modify->create

fabio_bellocchio — Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:52:29 GMT

Thank you Gabriel.

Actually your answer is the closest to the solution it could get.

Based on this post:

https://answers.sap.com/questions/149370/problem-updating-new-values-to-a-node-in-runtime-i.html

"If we set the wrong root_key, the instance is not properly attached to its parent and will be lost in space". This is exactly what happened.

I commented out the parameter, and the issue is fixed.

Thank you very much for your analysis and guidance.