<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: date conversion in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/date-conversion/m-p/1695513#M305182</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the only difference is the accuracy. The number of trailing zeros does not change the value of a type F variable at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Possibly one is with and the other without sign allowing one more decimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't worry 2.006102800000000E+07 = &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;            2.0061028000000000E+07 =&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;            20061028&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference is the representation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better try GET TIMESTAMP concept.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clemens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clemens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clemenss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-10T00:08:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>date conversion</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/date-conversion/m-p/1695512#M305181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi frnds,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; i want to convert a date field to type f..i could do that.. but the same value in database in table ausp is different. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATFLV = 2.006103100000000E&lt;EM&gt;07  in ausp table.. it has 8 "0's" between 1 and E... but when i convert sy-datum to type f it comes as 2.0061028000000000E&lt;/EM&gt;07.... that is 9 "0's"  between 8 and E... why is that ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Points assured to all replies..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Madan..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/date-conversion/m-p/1695512#M305181</guid>
      <dc:creator>madan_ullasa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-09T23:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: date conversion</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/date-conversion/m-p/1695513#M305182</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the only difference is the accuracy. The number of trailing zeros does not change the value of a type F variable at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Possibly one is with and the other without sign allowing one more decimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't worry 2.006102800000000E+07 = &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;            2.0061028000000000E+07 =&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;            20061028&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference is the representation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better try GET TIMESTAMP concept.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clemens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clemens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/date-conversion/m-p/1695513#M305182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Clemenss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-10T00:08:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

