<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Evaluate SAP OSS notes implementation from authorizations perspective in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/evaluate-sap-oss-notes-implementation-from-authorizations-perspective/m-p/675621#M29874</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;As an authorization consultant I get requests from our Basis team to evaluate security notes which would be implemented in our production system. This is their requirement"- "... you need to check whether notes would have any impact after implementation (Security impact), e.g. if any customized t-code is already present in the system and notes have certain restrictions which would impact that t-code."&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;In general I am fine with these kind of requests when a note obviously refers to an authorization activity, e.g. set an authority check for a new field, however in some cases I find a bit ambiguous whether the change would have any impact from authorizations perspective. &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I understand that cannot be a universal solution, but would you have any suggestions as to how to handle this, e.g. under 'Other terms' paragraph of a notes template, if there is no Authorization/authorization check mentioned, could I assume that I could give a greenlight for a note's implementation?&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Mirjana&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-28T13:39:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluate SAP OSS notes implementation from authorizations perspective</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/evaluate-sap-oss-notes-implementation-from-authorizations-perspective/m-p/675621#M29874</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;As an authorization consultant I get requests from our Basis team to evaluate security notes which would be implemented in our production system. This is their requirement"- "... you need to check whether notes would have any impact after implementation (Security impact), e.g. if any customized t-code is already present in the system and notes have certain restrictions which would impact that t-code."&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;In general I am fine with these kind of requests when a note obviously refers to an authorization activity, e.g. set an authority check for a new field, however in some cases I find a bit ambiguous whether the change would have any impact from authorizations perspective. &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I understand that cannot be a universal solution, but would you have any suggestions as to how to handle this, e.g. under 'Other terms' paragraph of a notes template, if there is no Authorization/authorization check mentioned, could I assume that I could give a greenlight for a note's implementation?&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Mirjana&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/evaluate-sap-oss-notes-implementation-from-authorizations-perspective/m-p/675621#M29874</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-28T13:39:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

