<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: UNIQUE KEY addition difference in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673662#M29733</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The problem is resolved now. Thank you for the efforts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>minchevm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-28T07:21:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UNIQUE KEY addition difference</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673660#M29731</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello SAP comunity,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I have 2 SAP systems - one version 702, one 750. &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Both are interpreting the statement bellow differently. 702 is creating the unique key for SORTED and HASHED tables correctly but not 750 (you could check that in the debugger).&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I am receiving short-dump because of this. Any idea how I may resolve the problem in 750?&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt; 
  &lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;DATA: lt_test LIKE HASHED TABLE OF t000 WITH UNIQUE KEY mtext.&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://answers.sap.com/storage/attachments/165546-2018-06-27-20-14-23-display-table-key-for-lt-test.jpg"&gt;2018-06-27-20-14-23-display-table-key-for-lt-test.jpg&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673660#M29731</guid>
      <dc:creator>minchevm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-27T17:15:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UNIQUE KEY addition difference</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673661#M29732</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;You probably want to use TYPE instead of LIKE since you're referencing a dictionary object. In ABAP OO, you'll get an error if you use LIKE like this.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I doubt that the short dump is related to the "Table index not up-to-date" warning. If you input data into your lt_test variable, the warning should vanish. Can you add the short dump to your question?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673661#M29732</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexFrank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-27T21:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UNIQUE KEY addition difference</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673662#M29733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The problem is resolved now. Thank you for the efforts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673662#M29733</guid>
      <dc:creator>minchevm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-28T07:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UNIQUE KEY addition difference</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673663#M29734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Reference for those that needed the answer - it as a dynamic internal table created from MDG API. The static definition and the dynamic definition via the API differed so I simply had to create it via one of the API methods.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unique-key-addition-difference/m-p/673663#M29734</guid>
      <dc:creator>minchevm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-13T12:31:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

