<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0 in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638555#M284559</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would prefer the ALE and some Midleware between two systems (for exampl. Business Connector). It is more flexible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you allredy use XI it will be better to use XI instead of BC but to implement the XI only for that purpose makes no sence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vladimir_golovtchiner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-10-23T10:46:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638551#M284555</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   We are having HR system in 4.7 version. We are implementing FI and Travel management in ECC 6.0 version. we need to have an interface from HR system to ECC 6.0 travel system. Which method is suitable for this?? Can we go for BAPIs??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chandra.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638551#M284555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-19T13:22:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638552#M284556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;BAPIs would be the best way to go if there are some available for your requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rich Heilman&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638552#M284556</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichHeilman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-19T13:33:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638553#M284557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   What about ALE?? which method is good in BAPI and ALE in this case??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chandra.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638553#M284557</guid>
      <dc:creator>csyadlapalli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-23T07:57:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638554#M284558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anybody help me out??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chandra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:30:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638554#M284558</guid>
      <dc:creator>csyadlapalli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-23T10:30:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638555#M284559</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would prefer the ALE and some Midleware between two systems (for exampl. Business Connector). It is more flexible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you allredy use XI it will be better to use XI instead of BC but to implement the XI only for that purpose makes no sence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638555#M284559</guid>
      <dc:creator>vladimir_golovtchiner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-23T10:46:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638556#M284560</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Vladimir,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Thanks for your reply. Anyway we dont have XI, we need to check alternative. Do we need business connector for this purpose, because both these are SAP systems??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chandra.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638556#M284560</guid>
      <dc:creator>csyadlapalli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-23T10:59:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface from 4.7 version to ECC 6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638557#M284561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want the data to be exchanged in a synchronus manner then BAPI's are the way to go.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, as I see no need of the same there, ALE / IDOC's should be a preferred way of doing as you can configure the IDOC's to be triggered as soon as there is a change in the data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And like you mentioned, both are SAP systems, so you wouldn't need a middleware, you can communicate using IDOCS'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ravi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note : Please mark all the helpful answers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/interface-from-4-7-version-to-ecc-6-0/m-p/1638557#M284561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-23T11:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

