<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cheque Overflow -Sapscript in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587832#M264857</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using payment progem RFFOUS_C for printing checks? is the sapscript copy of F110_PRENUM_CHCK?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have FIRST and NEXT pages in sapscript?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you printing void check info under text element 540 and Negotiable chec info under text element 545?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sridhar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sridhar_k1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-13T21:30:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Overflow -Sapscript</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587831#M264856</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue with Overflow Checks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally If I have two pages of spool first one (ex: 100) should be voided and next 101 should be negoitable i.e it should be updated in database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My issue is it is printing 100 on both pages and 101 is being updated in database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using ®UD-CHECT&amp;amp; in both the pages for check numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you help me in this regard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vara&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: Vara K&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587831#M264856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-13T20:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cheque Overflow -Sapscript</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587832#M264857</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using payment progem RFFOUS_C for printing checks? is the sapscript copy of F110_PRENUM_CHCK?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have FIRST and NEXT pages in sapscript?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you printing void check info under text element 540 and Negotiable chec info under text element 545?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sridhar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587832#M264857</guid>
      <dc:creator>sridhar_k1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-13T21:30:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cheque Overflow -Sapscript</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587833#M264858</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;YES&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; for all the questions which you have asked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vara&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587833#M264858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-13T22:09:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cheque Overflow -Sapscript</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587834#M264859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should change the second check number to 101, can't think of the reason why it's doing that. Is the sapscript also printing summary section?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Search rffous_c for 540 and 545, set break point at WRITE_FORM fm in the search result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clear the Number of sample printouts and execute the program and check REGUD-CHECT value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If needed turn on sapscript debugger too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also try printing by selecting 'Do not void any checks'  cehck box in the selection screen of RFFOUS_C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sridhar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: Sridhar K&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cheque-overflow-sapscript/m-p/1587834#M264859</guid>
      <dc:creator>sridhar_k1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-13T22:32:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

