topic Re: IDOC Error Raise. in Application Development and Automation Discussions

IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:20:10 GMT

Hi..

I have an outbound Configuration for my Delivery using the Message control technique in SAP.

Now,I am testing it manually by going in the transaction code WE15 (RSNAST00) and running it for my application object(Delivery Number).

If everything is smooth then no problem, but if there is an error at any place inside the FM (used to create an o/b IDOC) then I am raising an error with the statement "RAISING ERROR_MESSAGE_RECEIVED".

The poblem is that I want this message to be visible in the Output processing Log of my delivery document which is not taking place now.

How shall I approach this problem?

Thank You

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:37:46 GMT

Hi Subash,

For you to update message in the output processing log of the delivery document, you need to use below funtion module.

CALL FUNCTION 'NAST_PROTOCOL_UPDATE'

EXPORTING

msg_arbgb = sy-msgid

msg_nr = sy-msgno

msg_ty = sy-msgty

msg_v1 = sy-msgv1

msg_v2 = sy-msgv2

EXCEPTIONS

OTHERS = 0.

REGARDS

SRIKANTH M

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:55:28 GMT

Thank you Srikant..

I checked that part in RSNAST00..you are correct that in my case this FM is not getting triggered because of a different returncode value used before the FM.

If the returncode value is 999 then only the values will be updated in the NAST table else not...

Now my problem is that in the program RSNAST00, if there is an err in my FM it is returning the sy-subrc = 1 which is passed to the return code.

I want to make it 999 in order to trigger the Output Log.

How shall I do that?

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:02:20 GMT

Subash,

I suggest you use the Function Module 'NAST_PROTOCOL_UPDATE' in your outbound Function Module. I suggest you do not change any return code. This will work.

Regards

Srikanth M

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:06:09 GMT

Nice suggestion Srikant..

I will do that and get back to you..

Thanks a lot..

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:14:19 GMT

Nice suggestion Srikant..

I will do that and get back to you..

Thanks a lot..

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:45:52 GMT

Hi Srikant...actually I tried that ...its failing there also..

I think we need to chg the return code anyhow if it is possible

Please guide me.

Thanks

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:11:24 GMT

Hi subash

I used this code before in a similar scenario , its working. In your outboud program just use below FM and see if there are any exceptions. Pass proper message type , number etc. Let's if this works.

CALL FUNCTION 'NAST_PROTOCOL_UPDATE'

EXPORTING

msg_arbgb = sy-msgid

msg_nr = sy-msgno

msg_ty = sy-msgty

msg_v1 = sy-msgv1

msg_v2 = sy-msgv2

EXCEPTIONS

OTHERS = 0.

regards

Srikanth M

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:36:54 GMT

Hi Srikant

Thanks again

But if you see inside the from NEW_DYN_PERFORM of the program RSNASTED, then you wll clearly see that even if the return code is NE '0' , still the error values are getting updated in the Table NAST.

So, I think it is something else that is preventing the error message.

however in the debug mode when the change the returncode to 999 then it shows me the message.

I couldnt understand the logic.

Thanks.

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:50:54 GMT

Hi subash,

Lets not change te return code to 999. We will call the Function module in our out bound program , and update the message ourselves.

regards

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:21:27 GMT

Hi Srikant..

Thanks a lot for your precious time...

I was using a message ID that was deleted from the system due to some reasons..:-)..thats why the err mrssage was not coming...

I know the reason is very silly...

Anyways thanks for your valuable assistance.

Re: IDOC Error Raise.

Former Member — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:32:37 GMT

hahahah ... good that you got it .

Regards

Srikanth M