<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PERFORMANCE in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433185#M206893</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's the same, I don't believe there's a performance difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway if you declare a work are you can use it as header line, so you should write:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.DATA: BEGIN OF line,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;col1(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;col2(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;END OF line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: etab LIKE TABLE OF line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOOP AT ETAB INTO LINE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ENDLOOP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The declarations of internal table without header line have to be used in OO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-24T10:03:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PERFORMANCE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433183#M206891</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the followinf code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.DATA: BEGIN OF line,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        col1(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        col2(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      END OF line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   DATA: etab LIKE TABLE OF line WITH HEADER LINE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.DATA: BEGIN OF ETAB OCCURS 0,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          col1(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        col2(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        END OF ETAB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 1 AND 2 DECALRATIONS..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ANY PERFORMANCE ISSUE DELACRING ITAB LIKE IN 2.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REGARDS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433183#M206891</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T09:58:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PERFORMANCE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433184#M206892</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;it  is   just  declaration  i  don't  think  it  impact  on performance issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433184#M206892</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T10:00:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PERFORMANCE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433185#M206893</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's the same, I don't believe there's a performance difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway if you declare a work are you can use it as header line, so you should write:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.DATA: BEGIN OF line,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;col1(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;col2(1) TYPE c,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;END OF line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: etab LIKE TABLE OF line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOOP AT ETAB INTO LINE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ENDLOOP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The declarations of internal table without header line have to be used in OO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433185#M206893</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T10:03:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PERFORMANCE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433186#M206894</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ravi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Practically No Difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Finally we are going to use the internal table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   ETAB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. After final declaration,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   the SKELETON of the internal table,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   is SAME&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   (whether we declare by option 1, or option 2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. There is NO  PERFROMANCE issue related,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    while declarating an object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  (the issue comes only when we LOOP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  and use the data inside the internal table)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 1 AND 2 DECALRATIONS..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. First u have declared a strucutre (LINE)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   then u have declared an internal table, using LINE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. U have declared directly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;amit m.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/1433186#M206894</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-24T10:03:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

