<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: buffering the table in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426132#M204259</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi manas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. i don't think buffering is required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;amit m.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-11T11:31:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>buffering the table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426131#M204258</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;guyz!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this post finds u all at high on spirit. over here, i am having a requirement to buffer one custom table. let me give the scenario of table access. here it goes:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. it gets updated every month. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. after getting updated, it is accessed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. i also believe that, table size is also small, i.e. size category  = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. finally the access is like, mostly it will retreive only one month data, by taking all the key fields. in my case there are 5 key fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so can any one suggest me, which buffering type to use. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;manas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426131#M204258</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-11T11:26:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: buffering the table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426132#M204259</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi manas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. i don't think buffering is required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;amit m.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426132#M204259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-11T11:31:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: buffering the table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426133#M204260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;select 'Buffering not allowed ' button for mentioned case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check this help:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Buffering status&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Definition&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The buffering status specifies whether or not a table may be buffered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This depends on how the table is used, for example on the expected volume of data in the table or on the type of access to a table. (mainly read or mainly write access to the table. In the latter case, for example, one would not select buffering).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should therefore select&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Buffering not allowed if a table may not be buffered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Buffering allowed but not activated if buffering is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  principally allowed for a table, but at the moment no buffering&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  should be active. The&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;buffering type specified in this case is only&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  a suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Buffering allowed if the table should be buffered. In this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  case a buffering type&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;must be specified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The buffering type defines whether and how the table should be buffered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are the following types of buffering:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;single-record buffering&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;generic area buffering&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;full buffering&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In generic area buffering, a number of key fields between 1 and no. of key fields-1 must be specified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426133#M204260</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laxmana_Appana_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-11T11:31:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: buffering the table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426134#M204261</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;since it is small table  since &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;size category = 0&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and Don't do any thing for Buffering. Don't change any default settings. No need of Buffering in your case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vijay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:36:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426134#M204261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-11T11:36:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: buffering the table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426135#M204262</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Buffering will increase the performance of the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If a table is accessed frequently, but all accesses are read accesses, this value can be exceeded.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For larger tables where large numbers of records are frequently accessed. However, if the application program is able to formulate an extremely selective WHERE condition using a database index, it may be advisable to dispense with full buffering.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For tables with frequent accesses to data not contained in the table. Since all records are contained in the buffer, a quick decision can be made as to whether or not the table contains a record for a specific key.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When considering whether a table should be fully buffered, you should take three aspects into account: the size of the table, the number of read accesses, and the number of write accesses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Tables best suited to full buffering are small, frequently read, and rarely updated.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rajesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/buffering-the-table/m-p/1426135#M204262</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-11T11:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

