<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CDS view group by fields in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742831#M2021209</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If i have multiple joins/associations with too many columns, all of them have to be in group by clause?! even the text field?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2023 02:12:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rashmits</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-27T02:12:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CDS view group by fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742829#M2021207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Should the number of columns/fields be same in select and 'group by' for a CDS view, getting below error when grouping by required fields. Trying to get the unique record based on STLNR and IDNRK from STPO table.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/attachments/2167319-image.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/attachments/2167316-image.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG style="margin-left:-87px;margin-top:-36.5px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 23:29:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742829#M2021207</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rashmits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T23:29:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CDS view group by fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742830#M2021208</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, I think that is basic sql syntax&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2023 02:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742830#M2021208</guid>
      <dc:creator>junwu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-27T02:09:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CDS view group by fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742831#M2021209</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If i have multiple joins/associations with too many columns, all of them have to be in group by clause?! even the text field?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2023 02:12:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742831#M2021209</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rashmits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-27T02:12:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CDS view group by fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742832#M2021210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you can just try, the compiler will tell u.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and yes, all needs to be there or you have to use aggregation function for those fields not presented in group by&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2023 02:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cds-view-group-by-fields/m-p/12742832#M2021210</guid>
      <dc:creator>junwu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-27T02:17:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

