<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Replacing SQL Views by CDS Views - TABLES statement in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/replacing-sql-views-by-cds-views-tables-statement/m-p/12511418#M2004055</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am working on &lt;A rel="nofollow noreferrer" href="https://wiki.wdf.sap.corp/wiki/display/SuiteCDS/VDM+CDS+Replacement+of+SQL+View+Usage"&gt;VDM CDS Replacement of SQL View Usage&lt;/A&gt;, and there is a specificity when replacing SQL Views on TABLES statements.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Example: 'TABLES: bsis.' can't be simply replaced by 'TABLES: bsis_view.'&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;The suggested approach as described in the Wiki is to &lt;EM&gt;"create a dedicated DDIC structure or DDIC view in SE11 as a substitute for the generated SQL view."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I am just wondering if anyone followed this approach and what's your feedback on that? Alternatively, is it an option to use the backup tables instead, such as BSIS_BCK in this example?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>goncalo_costa_levy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-31T12:37:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing SQL Views by CDS Views - TABLES statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/replacing-sql-views-by-cds-views-tables-statement/m-p/12511418#M2004055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am working on &lt;A rel="nofollow noreferrer" href="https://wiki.wdf.sap.corp/wiki/display/SuiteCDS/VDM+CDS+Replacement+of+SQL+View+Usage"&gt;VDM CDS Replacement of SQL View Usage&lt;/A&gt;, and there is a specificity when replacing SQL Views on TABLES statements.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Example: 'TABLES: bsis.' can't be simply replaced by 'TABLES: bsis_view.'&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;The suggested approach as described in the Wiki is to &lt;EM&gt;"create a dedicated DDIC structure or DDIC view in SE11 as a substitute for the generated SQL view."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I am just wondering if anyone followed this approach and what's your feedback on that? Alternatively, is it an option to use the backup tables instead, such as BSIS_BCK in this example?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/replacing-sql-views-by-cds-views-tables-statement/m-p/12511418#M2004055</guid>
      <dc:creator>goncalo_costa_levy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-31T12:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing SQL Views by CDS Views - TABLES statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/replacing-sql-views-by-cds-views-tables-statement/m-p/12511419#M2004056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in our S/4 syste BSIS is already a CDS view.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 06:29:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/replacing-sql-views-by-cds-views-tables-statement/m-p/12511419#M2004056</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertVit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-01T06:29:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

