topic Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem in Application Development and Automation Discussions

BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:07:42 GMT

fb60-badi.pngI need to add a 1 byte field to FB60. The field will not reside in any table such as BSEG of BKPF but rather, will be used as a flag to conditionally execute some other code.

I've added the field to the screen (see attached) and have implemented BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 with me->if_ex_badi_fdcb_subbas04~invfo = im_invfo (In the PUT) and ex_invfo = me->if_ex_badi_fdcb_subbas04~invfo (In the GET).

I've added the field to INVFO (See attached).

However, whenever I enter a value in the new field and hit any other key, the screen field is being cleared. The value that I enter is not being retained.

Thanks

Leo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

FredericGirod — Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:09:13 GMT

Looks like you have not code performed in the PAI

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

former_member182371 — Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:20:14 GMT

Please do search in the forums.

e.g.

Custom Field value gets cleared in BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04

wiki

Best regards,

Pablo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Thu, 09 Jan 2020 18:42:44 GMT

Frederic

See attached. The field invfo-start_workflow is being sent and received but not the zztax field.

Leo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Thu, 09 Jan 2020 18:44:26 GMT

Thanks Pablo

I read those pieces yesterday but fail to see how they address this specific issue.

Leo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

former_member182371 — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:48:29 GMT

did you have a look at the wiki below?

Display customer fields in header of logistics invoice verification transactions

if you follow and check the steps needed i believe you´ll be able to solve the problem.

Best regards,

Pablo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

rupesh_brahmankar — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 07:00:32 GMT

Hello,

Please refer SAP note 2806250 - INVFO fields are overwritten

Best Regards,

R.Brahmankar

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:03:57 GMT

Thanks. Already applied.

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:15:14 GMT

Thanks for the quick replies.

Pablo, referring to your wiki, I did look at it a few days ago.

To quote:

Screen fields: The fields must be in structure INVFO. This was done.

If the values in the FI document are to be saved, the fields must also be in table BKPF or BSEG. My request is for FI (FB60), yours was for MM. The screen value is not to be saved on any table. It's to be used as a switch for a customer-function. So, it would seem that it's not required that the new field be appended to a table.

All of the PUTs and GETs in the PBO and PAI already existed for a prior custom field (invfo-start_workflow) that was used in MIRO many years ago. The only code I added to the PAI was for zztax:

* implement from here on customer coding
* enumerate ALL fields on the screen because of field transportation
* with or within a module
FIELD:
invfo-start_workflow,
invfo-zztax.

I can try appending BKPF to see if it has any affect.

Leo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

former_member182371 — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:29:42 GMT

Hi,

i believe you need this part:

"So I created my customer fields in append structures of:

INVFO, RBKP, RBKP_V, ACMM_VENDOR_COMP."

if not the value of zztax will always be blank.

Best regards,

Pablo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:30:46 GMT

Ok, I appended the field to BKPF and it appears to work.

I didn't think that was necessary as I don't need to save the field in a table but Asi es la vida!

Thanks again for the assistance.

Leo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:32:09 GMT

Pablo, I appended the field to BKPF and it appears to work.

I didn't think that was necessary as I don't need to save the field in a table but Asi es la vida!

Thanks again for the assistance.

Leo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

former_member182371 — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:47:07 GMT

so you´re only interested in that field value when "posting"?

Best regards,

Pablo

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:59:59 GMT

Correct. That's the next challenge.

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

Sandra_Rossi — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:20:45 GMT

If the field is to exist on one screen only during the transaction, and not to be stored in the database, adding the field to the database is the worst solution.

Unfortunately, you don't describe in details when you use this checkbox (at save time? when exactly?), so it's difficult to help.

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

spinellll — Fri, 10 Jan 2020 23:00:07 GMT

Upon SAVE.

And I agree about the database but it appears to be the only way to preserve the screen value while employing the BADI.

Re: BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 Problem

rupesh_brahmankar — Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:21:17 GMT

Hello,

Please check another SAP note in same area, 2830829 - INVFO fields are overwritten

Best Regards,

R.Brahmankar