<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Update Work Item Container Programmatically in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099916#M1972620</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Is it ok or considered "safe" to update a work item container programmatically?&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I do this because in the standard PO approval workflow design is to complete the workflow instance after approve/reject and trigger a new workflow instance in case there is still a next level approver required. In this case, in Fiori My Inbox 2 application the comment input in the previous approval process cannot be seen in the next approval process because now the workflow instance is different. Therefore, I read the previous workflow instance and get the comments and put it in the current work item container so it can be seen in the Fiori My Inbox 2 application.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suwandi_cahyadi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-12T13:36:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Update Work Item Container Programmatically</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099916#M1972620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Is it ok or considered "safe" to update a work item container programmatically?&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;I do this because in the standard PO approval workflow design is to complete the workflow instance after approve/reject and trigger a new workflow instance in case there is still a next level approver required. In this case, in Fiori My Inbox 2 application the comment input in the previous approval process cannot be seen in the next approval process because now the workflow instance is different. Therefore, I read the previous workflow instance and get the comments and put it in the current work item container so it can be seen in the Fiori My Inbox 2 application.&lt;/P&gt;
  &lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099916#M1972620</guid>
      <dc:creator>suwandi_cahyadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-12T13:36:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Update Work Item Container Programmatically</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099917#M1972621</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont think i will be problem if you used enhacment. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099917#M1972621</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nawanandana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-12T13:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Update Work Item Container Programmatically</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099918#M1972622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Really strange decision to start a new workflow, the next level should be part of the same workflow...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess you had to make a choice because it's a standard workflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But anyway, technically, it's not an issue to update a container. Just make sure that it doesn't bug the standard workflow.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/update-work-item-container-programmatically/m-p/12099918#M1972622</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandra_Rossi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-12T15:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

