<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Structural Information - S842E - S842 in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-information-s842e-s842/m-p/11904455#M1962588</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello World!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've a simple hard question .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table S842 is different from its structural info table S842E on 2 key fields. It's a situation that comes from long and long ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is: Is there a method to align these two tables without losing any data on the S842 or we need to regenerate all the S842&amp;nbsp; from MC22 and with this recreate&amp;nbsp; S842E structure in automatic way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your support&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DBY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>roberto_vacca2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-22T08:01:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Structural Information - S842E - S842</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-information-s842e-s842/m-p/11904455#M1962588</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello World!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've a simple hard question .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table S842 is different from its structural info table S842E on 2 key fields. It's a situation that comes from long and long ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is: Is there a method to align these two tables without losing any data on the S842 or we need to regenerate all the S842&amp;nbsp; from MC22 and with this recreate&amp;nbsp; S842E structure in automatic way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your support&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DBY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-information-s842e-s842/m-p/11904455#M1962588</guid>
      <dc:creator>roberto_vacca2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-22T08:01:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Structural Information - S842E - S842</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-information-s842e-s842/m-p/11904456#M1962589</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seemed a bit difficult, but in the end it was necessary that the rules and the features were regenerated from the MC25 / MC24 and, finally, they were recreated the information structures from the MC22 through the regeneration function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:15:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/structural-information-s842e-s842/m-p/11904456#M1962589</guid>
      <dc:creator>roberto_vacca2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-22T12:15:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

