<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regarding the quickfix with multiple includes in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747127#M1949972</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have had the same problem, I hope some guru can help us with this issue,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T18:40:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding the quickfix with multiple includes</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747126#M1949971</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been working with ADT for quite some time now but one thing always bothered me. In some cases I can't get the quickfix to work for method creation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If, for example, I'm programming a &lt;STRONG&gt;module-pool&lt;/STRONG&gt; and I try to follow the example of the MEGUI function group:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Class Definitions&lt;/STRONG&gt; ending with CDX where x is a number or a letter&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Class Implementations&lt;/STRONG&gt; ending with CIX where x is a number or a letter.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've done some tests, both involving function groups and module pools. I can get the quickfix to work if I use the default naming recomendation(Class definitions on the top include inside includes with naming L+Function Group name + DXX) that is described inside the function groups, but If I deviate from this standard in the class names, the quickfix doesn't work at all but the navigation works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, Is it due to a lack of support on the eclipse side or is a special naming convention always necessary? If so, is it only supported on function groups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747126#M1949971</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianos_campanhola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T18:05:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding the quickfix with multiple includes</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747127#M1949972</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have had the same problem, I hope some guru can help us with this issue,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747127#M1949972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T18:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding the quickfix with multiple includes</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747128#M1949973</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Adriano and Erick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in principle those quickfixes should also work inside function groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure for module pools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For my knowledge module pools were already deprecated when&amp;nbsp; I started my career at SAP about 20 years ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We can investigate further if you tell me which kind of method creation you talk about.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create method from call?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create missing interface methods?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create missing method implementation or definition?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;...?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does the problem appear in in module pools only or also in function groups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Michael &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747128#M1949973</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_gutfleisch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-20T08:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding the quickfix with multiple includes</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747129#M1949974</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;Hello Michael, I've talked to Erick and he's using a namespace, we found the SAP Notes 1799896 and 1806765 that are related to the problem, but we're both on SAP Kernel Version 741 SP 11.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;In his case, the code completion doesn't work at all in the function group, even variables won't show up, but the quickfix works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;I've done some testing today, and I found out that it's a very specific call that causes an error and that has a workaround: If I try to generate a static method from another class, it doesn't work properly:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2-16790857-979065/ScreenHunter_42 Jun. 20 11.29.jpg" style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; color: #3778c7; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/979111" height="97" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;Also, If I save every time before using a quickfix it works:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2-16790857-979066/ScreenHunter_42 Jun. 20 11.32.jpg" style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; color: #3778c7; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/979115" height="94" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;What seems to be working(without the workaround):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Generating instance and static methods inside the same class.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I've tested the quickfix with the variable on top(changing it to an attribute) and it works fine without saving.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Declaring a method and using the quickfix works(although, it doesn't warn me that an implementation of the method doesn't exist) without saving:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2-16790857-979100/ScreenHunter_42 Jun. 20 11.41.jpg" style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; color: #3778c7; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/979116" height="82" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Generating a method directly from an implementation also works fine.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;I also asked Erick, since his case is a bit different in the sense that he uses a namespace. In his case, the workaround for the static call doesn't work and the rest seems to be working fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;Edit: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;I kept doing the development in the function group and I noticed that the create from call, and even saving it, eclipse won't auto-detect the variable types&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/979251" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-the-quickfix-with-multiple-includes/m-p/11747129#M1949974</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianos_campanhola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-20T14:59:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

