<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Security advantage with reverse invoke or not? in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/security-advantage-with-reverse-invoke-or-not/m-p/11552654#M1936751</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Frank,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Web Dispatcher provides some additional benefits in terms of security but you can't think of it as a silver bullet. I would never suggest to expose core business system directly to the internet. E.g. just for DDoS prevention. If somebody is start hitting you with DDoS you can always shutdown web dispatcher and your core business system can be still accessed via internal network. This could be achieved via other means but it's still an option. Another plus for web dispatcher is that it supports load balancing to multiple application servers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Web dispatcher also allows you to setup rudimentary URL filtering (you need to drop or terminate SSL connection to be able to do this). So that's another layer of preventing exposing something that should be kept hidden.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mvoros</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-03T19:01:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Security advantage with reverse invoke or not?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/security-advantage-with-reverse-invoke-or-not/m-p/11552653#M1936750</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi colleagues,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have an scenario with an reverse proxy in front of an sap system. The reverse proxy stands in the dmz. The sap system is in data center. The Reverse Invoke with a sap webdispatcher in the dmz seems to be promising more security because the firewall don't have open ports from dmz to data center.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;The help.sap.com entry I have found &lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;describe it &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;thin and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;my&lt;/SPAN&gt; other &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;search&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;I haven't&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt; found any&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;notes whether this s&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;cenario&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;is safer at using URL exploits? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;If there is an&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;exploit&lt;/SPAN&gt;, is the &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;exploit&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;executed&lt;/SPAN&gt; on the sap system &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; than &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;delivered via&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;reverse&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;invoke&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;in&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;dmz to the sap web dispatcher? So in this scenario only one system can attacked or will the attack stops at the sap web dispatcher?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;or can this only blocked with an firewall and activ Intrusion Prevention System/Intrusion Detection System?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;So the only advantage with a sap web dispatcher is that the attack stops in dmz and system is &lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;still&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;vulnerable but delivering the attacks to the dmz?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;Maybe someone&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;can&lt;/SPAN&gt; describe &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;reverse&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;procedure&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;accurately. H&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;opefully it's&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;clearly explained for you. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="short_text" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;Frank Schewe&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/security-advantage-with-reverse-invoke-or-not/m-p/11552653#M1936750</guid>
      <dc:creator>frank_schewe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-03T14:42:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security advantage with reverse invoke or not?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/security-advantage-with-reverse-invoke-or-not/m-p/11552654#M1936751</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Frank,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Web Dispatcher provides some additional benefits in terms of security but you can't think of it as a silver bullet. I would never suggest to expose core business system directly to the internet. E.g. just for DDoS prevention. If somebody is start hitting you with DDoS you can always shutdown web dispatcher and your core business system can be still accessed via internal network. This could be achieved via other means but it's still an option. Another plus for web dispatcher is that it supports load balancing to multiple application servers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Web dispatcher also allows you to setup rudimentary URL filtering (you need to drop or terminate SSL connection to be able to do this). So that's another layer of preventing exposing something that should be kept hidden.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/security-advantage-with-reverse-invoke-or-not/m-p/11552654#M1936751</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvoros</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-03T19:01:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

