topic Re: Org Value overflow in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Org Value overflow

Sankar_Aravind — Thu, 05 Nov 2015 08:41:52 GMT

Hi Team,

Need a suggestion on one org value issue.

It seems there is a org value entry limit.

1000 - 2000

2000 - 2004

2008 - 5000

5000

5001

5002

6007

6008

Say for example the limit ends here.

Now if i am using a custom program, for mass org value updation. My company code is 6010.

once i execute the program, it is overwriting the value.

1000 - 2000

2000 - 2004

2008 - 5000

5000

5001

5002

6007

6010

How i achieve the mass updation of this org values.

Thanks,

Sankar.

Re: Org Value overflow

Bernhard_SAP — Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:09:14 GMT

did you analyze your coding already, why its overwriting values instead of adding the value?

By the way, I expect, that you know SAP note 410993...

b.rgds, Bernhard

Re: Org Value overflow

niteshgupta87 — Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:09:14 GMT

Try to add an org value manually, once you see that its being over written by your program. If you can add it manually, then its a problem with the custom program only. You can then work with abapper to identify the issue.

Re: Org Value overflow

Sankar_Aravind — Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:02:23 GMT

Is there like this any time happened ? and is there a custom program through which we can do mass org changes safely ?

Thanks in advance.

Re: Org Value overflow

surya_appala — Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:36:24 GMT

Hi Sankar,

"Custom programs" definition says that creation of your own logic and working principle according to your need which cannot be fulfilled with standard behavior of product (SAP). So please check with your seniors or with ABAPers to correct your project defined custom programs.

Regards,

Surya

Re: Org Value overflow

Former Member — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:27:23 GMT

Hi Aravind,

When you mention custom program then you need to check with your ABAP team what logic they have used in the program. Is there any length limit set? It should work, you just need to check program logic.

Thanks,

Shiv

Re: Org Value overflow

niteshgupta87 — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:24:20 GMT

No. I haven't come across such issue. I don't have any custom program either right now.

Re: Org Value overflow

Former Member — Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:50:27 GMT

To be honest, this is not a big surprise and happens often... (direct updates to SAP tables which then torch the data consistency).

As such programs and also tools on the market often update SAP tables in an incompatible way, you cannot return to maintenance from PFCG afterwards when you want to use other features of PFCG.

Worse case you will be referred to SAP Note # 7 and will have to start all over and pay for the reimplementation (latest then you do not want to be the author of the program).

I guess you are not going to post your code because we can then all see what has been done, and without that we cannot help you and quite frankly we should not encourage the community to update tables by helping you work out they keys to this table.

The good news is that if you are not using APIs or API equivalents, then with the package concept I am looking very forward to the day when external updates will be blocked completely in open SQL.

Might as well lock the thread...

Cheers,

Julius

Re: Org Value overflow

Sankar_Aravind — Thu, 08 Sep 2016 11:09:39 GMT

So, is there no way we can have some through to update 200 roles manually than automated ?

Thanks,

Sankar.

Re: Org Value overflow

Sankar_Aravind — Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:22:10 GMT

Hello Team,

Is there any way we can update the org values for 100s of roles with this limitation ?

Thanks,

Aru.

Re: Org Value overflow

Sankar_Aravind — Thu, 06 Oct 2016 08:34:20 GMT

Any update ?

or can we get any message saying that Org field is overfilled ?

How can we achieve this ? Doing for 250 roles manually is very long.

Please advise.

Thanks,

Sankar.

Re: Org Value overflow

Rajesh_Naik — Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:03:56 GMT

Hi Aravind,

Its always the best way to actually go and update the org values in the roles manually rather than manipulating the tables directly.

In my earlier projects, I have tried to use LSMW scripts in the foreground using recordings with marginal success. Its needs to be done with utmost care, else your rework might end up taking up more time and effort than what was required originally to do the work manually one by one.

Since its a one time activity, I would still recommend the traditional approach, rather than the time and effort saving automated approach. In the end, patience always pays.

Thanks,

Rajesh