<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30 in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171043#M1908270</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Thanks Anand,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;More doubt is more technically. I want understand the logical behind the way the system uses to validate what fields it will read in case of a PA20 or PA30 transaction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;In a role with this two transactions we have only one P_ORGIN object but we have the double of fields.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;How the system knows what fields go for PA20 or PA30?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pedro_carvalho2097</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-21T16:13:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171041#M1908268</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;I have a doubt about how the system identifies the values associate to PA20 and PA30 transactions in a role with this two transactions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Both transaction have the object P_ORGIN but when keep this both transactions in a role the system create different profiles bellow this object.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;I know that one is for PA20 (because have R value in field&amp;nbsp; AUTHC) and another is for PA30 (because have W&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt; value in field&amp;nbsp; AUTHC) but my doubt is how the system validate the correct values to PA20 or PA30 when a user access to this transactions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171041#M1908268</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_carvalho2097</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-21T14:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171042#M1908269</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Pedro,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you check navigation path from easy menu you will be able differntiate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PA20--&amp;gt;SAP Menu&lt;/STRONG&gt;-&amp;gt;Human Resources-&amp;gt;Personnel Management-&amp;gt;Administration-&amp;gt;HR Master Data-&amp;gt;Display&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA30---&amp;gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SAP Menu&lt;/STRONG&gt;-&amp;gt;Human Resources-&amp;gt;Personnel Management-&amp;gt;Administration-&amp;gt;HR Master Data-&amp;gt;Maintain&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similarly even if they have common authorization object based on restriction ...they will routed two two different views.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anand&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171042#M1908269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-21T16:04:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171043#M1908270</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Thanks Anand,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;More doubt is more technically. I want understand the logical behind the way the system uses to validate what fields it will read in case of a PA20 or PA30 transaction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;In a role with this two transactions we have only one P_ORGIN object but we have the double of fields.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;How the system knows what fields go for PA20 or PA30?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171043#M1908270</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_carvalho2097</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-21T16:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171044#M1908271</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you build role by transaction assigning, system gives you only authorization objects set in configuration as "proposal" (SU24). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For PA20 it can be P_ORGIN-AUTHC=R with all other fields empty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Technically &lt;/SPAN&gt;in ABAP programs authorization check code is placed for specific authorization object values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If user have any role with P_ORGIN-AUTHC=W the system lets you go forward in PA30, if not - authorization error - no access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Przemek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:36:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171044#M1908271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Private_Member_69416</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-22T06:36:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171045#M1908272</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pedro,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If both the instances of P_ORGIN are assigned in 1 user, then both the set of values will be applicable to both the t-codes. So, you can use one instance, instead of 2.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore, you need to exclude W(write authorizations) in P_PERNR. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally,&amp;nbsp; For the Infotypes, for which you would need Maintain access, you would also need Display access, for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Plaban&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171045#M1908272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-22T13:12:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171046#M1908273</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: .0001pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Thanks for the reply Pablan,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;But in that case, if the system uses both set of values for the same object, how can I have restrictions for PA30 (for example, some infotypes can be modify) and other restriction for PA20 (can display all infotypes per example)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Regards &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171046#M1908273</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_carvalho2097</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-22T14:16:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171047#M1908274</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pedro,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mainly the screen which appears for PA20 is display only and PA30 with maintenance access this is because the functionalities are hard coded in ABAP program. To answer your question, PA20 won't give you possibility to maintain though you have access maintained as AUTHC = W due the standard SAP code, whereas in PA30 you will get access to maintain and then it checks for AUTHC = W/R in later stage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this answers your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shiv&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171047#M1908274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-22T14:33:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAP ECC - Authorizations tcode PA20/PA30</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171048#M1908275</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pedro&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both PA20 and PA30 are using the same shared program but different screen layouts - and buttons. So it's the same authorisation object P_ORGIN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To allow some to be change vs some display, you need to have two P_ORGIN authorisations. In one you would specify the AUTHC = R (and M for matchcode search) with the infotypes you want to allow read only to (i.e. use in PA20 or only allow display option in PA30). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the second authorisation you would allow the AUTHC = W for the infotypes you want to allow create, change, delete, etc to. Note, you would more than likely include display as well. Therefore, these infotypes could be displayed in PA20 but edited in PA30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, you want to allow display only to IT0000 through to 0003 but update to 0105 (common security piece I have to do).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you would have Auth1 is R, M for 0000 to 0003 and Auth2 would be R, M, E for 0105. In transaction PA20, you could access 0000, 0001, 0002, 0003 and 0105 in display. In transaction PA30 you could also display the 4 infotypes but you could only edit 0105.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Colleen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/sap-ecc-authorizations-tcode-pa20-pa30/m-p/11171048#M1908275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-27T14:10:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

