<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: A016 table is giving performance issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972728#M1894371</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting - I see it as a pooled table. What database system are you on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:09:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972718#M1894361</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Gurus,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a query on A016 table and get the condition record number. Below is the query&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;select kappl kschl evrtn evrtp dtabi datab knumh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;into table t_a016 from a016&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for all entries in t_ekab&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where kappl = 'M'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; and kschl = 'PB00'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; and evrtn = t_ekab-ebeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; and evrtp = t_ekab-ebelp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; and datbi &amp;gt;= t_ekab-bedat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; and datb&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;= t_ekab-bedat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from the above in t_ekab am having entries 30,000 records based on selection screen. I see that in A016 table there are 2lak entries. It is taking too much time(2hrs in background) retrieve the data from A016 table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did I miss anything in the select query and how can I make above select query to fetch effective and faster?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help me to fine tuning of the above query.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mualikrishna Peravali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 11:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972718#M1894361</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T11:31:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972719#M1894362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Murali,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please use Inner Join in the select statement instead of For all entries and you can check how much time it is taking in ST05 , when you replace with Join.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the performance will improve and generally i prefer to use Join .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also check the below links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/thread/3370614"&gt;http://scn.sap.com/thread/3370614&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/thread/919187"&gt;http://scn.sap.com/thread/919187&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:25:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972719#M1894362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:25:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972720#M1894363</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This SELECT seems OK to me. Are you sure the problem isn't with the SELECT from EKAB?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972720#M1894363</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:35:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972721#M1894364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Murali,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you try creating by creating a secondary Index for all the key fields and also include DATA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure that the sequence of the fields in the select query matches the sequence mentioned in the Secondary-Index.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope there will be improvement in performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is 2 hrs is consumed only on fetching the records or it includes other data processing also ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gupta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:38:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972721#M1894364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:38:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972722#M1894365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Ramya,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for response. Actually I will also prefer to use join, but here before this select statement I have done some calculation part on t_ekab for filtering the records and then I have written the select statement on A016. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muralikrishna Peravali.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:52:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972722#M1894365</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:52:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972723#M1894366</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Rob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, there is no problem with EKAB selection. The problem is at query on A016.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muralikrishna Peravali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972723#M1894366</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:53:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972724#M1894367</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Gopal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reply. As am aware that we can not create a secondary index on table AXXX because those are pooled tables. Correct me if am wrong?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 hrs is only fetching the data from the table A016.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muralikrishna Peravali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972724#M1894367</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:55:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972725#M1894368</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It doesn't really matter because you are already using the primary key.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972725#M1894368</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T13:59:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972726#M1894369</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Murali,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table A016 is a transparent table so you can create it easily.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also since you are using for all entries do the following in internal table &lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;t_ekab before calling the select query.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;i) Check if the itab &lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;t_ekab is not initial or else the select query on A016 will return all the entries&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;iI) Sort &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;the itab &lt;SPAN&gt;t_ekab&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;iiI) Delete duplicate entries comparing the fields that you are using in query condition.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Gupta&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972726#M1894369</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:03:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972727#M1894370</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Rob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggested to create a secondary index because in the condition "&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px;"&gt;datab" is a non-key field.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gupta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972727#M1894370</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:07:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972728#M1894371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting - I see it as a pooled table. What database system are you on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972728#M1894371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:09:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972729#M1894372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the primary key already uniquely identifies all records, so adding another field couldn't help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:11:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972729#M1894372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:11:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972730#M1894373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gopal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I too see A016 as pooled table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muralikrishna Peravali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972730#M1894373</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:22:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972731#M1894374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Database is Hana-DB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the table is Pooled table then secondary index wont work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972731#M1894374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:24:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972732#M1894375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Murali,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since its a pooled table, secondary index wont work now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Step 1. Reducing the internal table entries:-&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As already suggested, first do the below set of changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then try with the following changes:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 10pt; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;i) Check if the itab &lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 12px; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;t_ekab is not initial or else the select query on A016 will return all the entries&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 10pt; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;iI) Sort &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;the itab &lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;t_ekab&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;iiI) Delete duplicate entries comparing the fields that you are using in query condition.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Step 2. Using parallel Process:-&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;I am aware of what and all you are doing after fetching the data from A016. But if you are doing some logic buildings after DB selection and there is no dependency among the records then you can opt the below steps:-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;i) Depending on the number of&amp;nbsp; records in T_EKAB, divide into multiple into smaller chunks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;ii) Create a FM which includes the Data selection from A016 and also the further processing &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;iii) For every smaller chunks call the FM in background task.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;Hope by doing so there will be increase in performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;Gupta&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; background: transparent;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972732#M1894375</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-07T14:42:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972733#M1894376</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am closing this thread. Actually in the select query I forgot include full primary key and was searching for performance. I forgot to include KSCHL in where clause that is why it was taking time. I have included that and now the report is in production last week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apologies for the inconvenience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muralikrishna.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972733#M1894376</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-15T13:54:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972734#M1894377</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;But KSCHL &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;was&lt;/SPAN&gt; in the WHERE clause that you posted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972734#M1894377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-15T14:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A016 table is giving performance issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972735#M1894378</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Rob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I have posted but not implemented in select query. I was thinking KSCHL is there in WHERE clause.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muralikrishna&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/a016-table-is-giving-performance-issue/m-p/10972735#M1894378</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member267445</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-15T14:13:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

