<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Full table scan when parsing Open SQL in oracle native SQL in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914313#M1890593</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Kiran, thanks you for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already checked that note, but i read carefully and my sql is according to the SAP note you mentioned, coincidentally is the same case that the note puts as an example (delivery for order). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;4. Other accesses in SD:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;OL style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;a) Document flow:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Incorrect:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SELECT vbelv FROM vbfa WHERE vbeln ...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In table VBFA only the preceeding document is used to search for the subsequent document (for example, delivery for order). Searching the other way makes no sense with this table since the preceding documents (for example, order for delivery) are stored directly in the document tables. Thus reading in table VBFA is a one-way street.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Correct:&amp;nbsp; SELECT vgbel FROM lips WHERE vbeln = ...; or&amp;nbsp; SELECT vgbel FROM vbrp WHERE vbeln = ...; or&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; SELECT aubel FROM vbrp WHERE vbeln = ...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Jhon Jairo Teran.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>former_member187007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-05T14:55:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Full table scan when parsing Open SQL in oracle native SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914311#M1890591</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to ask you why after upgrade to EHP7 SP 6, a select statemen that worked well in EHP7 SP 0, now is making a full table scan over the vbfa table when i see the ST05 sql trace, what triggers to very poor performance when reading this table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please welcome all your advices and comments to this simple SQL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;SELECT t1~vbeln t1~posnr t1~vgbel t1~vgpos t1~lfimg t1~ntgew INTO TABLE it_entregas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;FROM lips AS t1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;INNER JOIN vbfa AS t2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;ON t1~vbeln = t2~vbeln&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;AND t1~posnr = t2~posnn&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_pedidos&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;WHERE t2~vbelv = it_pedidos-vbeln&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND t2~posnv = it_pedidos-posnr&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND t2~vbtyp_n = 'J'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S31"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND t2~vbtyp_v = 'C'.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The internal table it_pedidos contains the sales order document number with the position number, to get the delivery numbers, and quantity and net weigth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regardless the way of get the information (i mean if there is another way to select the information), i would like to know why this sentence have to do a full table scan over vbfa table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i realized that this was happening i do a sql trace with the same scenario in a system before upgrade and compare it with this system (after upgrade) so what i found was that before the upgrade there was not full table scan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the execution plan in system after upgrade:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SQL Statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;SELECT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; DISTINCT "T1"."VBELN","T1"."POSNR","T1"."VGBEL","T1"."VGPOS","T1"."LFIMG","T1"."NTGEW"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;FROM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; "LIPS" "T1" INNER JOIN "VBFA" "T2" ON "T1"."MANDT"="T2"."MANDT" AND "T1"."VBELN"="T2"."VBELN" AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T1"."POSNR"="T2"."POSNN"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;WHERE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; ("T1"."MANDT"=:A0 AND "T2"."VBELV"=:A1 AND "T2"."POSNV"=:A2 AND "T2"."VBTYP_N"=:A3 AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T2"."VBTYP_V"=:A4) OR ("T1"."MANDT"=:A5 AND "T2"."VBELV"=:A6 AND "T2"."POSNV"=:A7 AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T2"."VBTYP_N"=:A8 AND "T2"."VBTYP_V"=:A9) OR ("T1"."MANDT"=:A10 AND "T2"."VBELV"=:A11 AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T2"."POSNV"=:A12 AND "T2"."VBTYP_N"=:A13 AND "T2"."VBTYP_V"=:A14)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/658245" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the execution plan in system before upgrade:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; SQL Statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; SELECT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T1"."VBELN","T1"."POSNR","T1"."VGBEL","T1"."VGPOS","T1"."LFIMG","T1"."NTGEW"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; FROM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; "LIPS" "T1" INNER JOIN "VBFA" "T2" ON "T2"."MANDT"=:A0 AND "T1"."VBELN"="T2"."VBELN" AND "T1"."POS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; NR"="T2"."POSNN"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; WHERE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; ("T1"."MANDT"=:A1 AND "T2"."VBELV"=:A2 AND "T2"."POSNV"=:A3 AND "T2"."VBTYP_N"=:A4 AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T2"."VBTYP_V"=:A5) OR ("T1"."MANDT"=:A6 AND "T2"."VBELV"=:A7 AND "T2"."POSNV"=:A8 AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T2"."VBTYP_N"=:A9 AND "T2"."VBTYP_V"=:A10) OR ("T1"."MANDT"=:A11 AND "T2"."VBELV"=:A12 AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; "T2"."POSNV"=:A13 AND "T2"."VBTYP_N"=:A14 AND "T2"."VBTYP_V"=:A15)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/658246" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After this results i try spliting this SQL into 2 SQL, one for VBFA and another to LIPS, the problem was solved, now it is not using full table scan:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/658255" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the execution plan for this SQL:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; SQL Statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; SELECT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; DISTINCT "VBELN","POSNN"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; FROM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; "VBFA" "T1"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; WHERE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; ("MANDT"=:A0 AND "VBELV"=:A1 AND "POSNV"=:A2 AND "VBTYP_N"=:A3 AND "VBTYP_V"=:A4) OR ("MANDT"=:A5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; AND "VBELV"=:A6 AND "POSNV"=:A7 AND "VBTYP_N"=:A8 AND "VBTYP_V"=:A9) OR ("MANDT"=:A10 AND "VBELV"=&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; :A11 AND "POSNV"=:A12 AND "VBTYP_N"=:A13 AND "VBTYP_V"=:A14) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/658259" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is why did i have to do this if technically is better use joins that using for all entries, besides why SAP changed the way it determines the sql if it was working well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here some components version after upgrade. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/658244" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I apprecitate all your comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jhon Jairo Teran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914311#M1890591</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member187007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-04T19:53:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full table scan when parsing Open SQL in oracle native SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914312#M1890592</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;John,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer to SAP Note 185530 for suggestions on performance improvement while accessing VBFA table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K.Kiran.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:55:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914312#M1890592</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiran_k8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-05T12:55:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full table scan when parsing Open SQL in oracle native SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914313#M1890593</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Kiran, thanks you for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already checked that note, but i read carefully and my sql is according to the SAP note you mentioned, coincidentally is the same case that the note puts as an example (delivery for order). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;4. Other accesses in SD:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;OL style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;a) Document flow:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Incorrect:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SELECT vbelv FROM vbfa WHERE vbeln ...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In table VBFA only the preceeding document is used to search for the subsequent document (for example, delivery for order). Searching the other way makes no sense with this table since the preceding documents (for example, order for delivery) are stored directly in the document tables. Thus reading in table VBFA is a one-way street.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Correct:&amp;nbsp; SELECT vgbel FROM lips WHERE vbeln = ...; or&amp;nbsp; SELECT vgbel FROM vbrp WHERE vbeln = ...; or&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; SELECT aubel FROM vbrp WHERE vbeln = ...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Lucida Console', Monaco, 'Courier new', monospace; font-size: 12px;"&gt;Jhon Jairo Teran.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914313#M1890593</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member187007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-05T14:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full table scan when parsing Open SQL in oracle native SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914314#M1890594</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might have a look at what secondary indexes were available on VBFA before and after the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect that the issue might have something to do with the JOIN conditions not using the first 2 index fields on VBFA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:20:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914314#M1890594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-05T15:20:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full table scan when parsing Open SQL in oracle native SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914315#M1890595</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Rob.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback. I checked the indexes and are the same before and after the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please explain me a little bit more what do you mean about JOIN condition is not using the 2 index fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I forgot to say that this table was fully reconstructed in indexes and statistics in an effort to try to repair this issue, but &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;neither &lt;/SPAN&gt;worked out. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advanced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jhon Jairo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 03:32:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/full-table-scan-when-parsing-open-sql-in-oracle-native-sql/m-p/10914315#M1890595</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member187007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-10T03:32:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

