topic Re: BADI Implementation vs Definition... in Application Development and Automation Discussions

BADI Implementation vs Definition...

Fabio777-hub — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:05:59 GMT

Good morning,

I have created via SE19 BADI implementation of ZMMCOLL_ME_REQ_POSTE that is a "copy" of standard BAPI ME_REQ_POSTED.

I have also done my abap code and all it's ok.

I haven't created any BADI definition via SE18, have I to do it? If I don't create BADI definition what kind of problem can have?Is something about transportation problems?

Now, If I have to create the BADI definition the question is: Can I create my BADI definition and connect it to my BADI Implementation or I have to create another BADI implementation?

Many thanks

Fabio.

Re: BADI Implementation vs Definition...

Former Member — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:46:49 GMT

Hi Fabio,

I didn't get your issue.

But in general you first need a BADI Definition, from which the BADI Interface will be generated. There are some options in the BADI Definition, for example, if you can have only one or several active Implementations.

You can only create a new implementation and activate it, too, if the multiple active implementations setting is set in the definition.

If this setting is active, after creating the new implementation don't forget to activate it.

Regards,

Klaus

Re: BADI Implementation vs Definition...

Former Member — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:06:15 GMT

hi ,

If I have understood your question corrently , for your implementation the definition name is me_req_posted.You just have to activate your implementation to call it.

Re: BADI Implementation vs Definition...

Former Member — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:27:09 GMT

You are implementing standard badi ME_REQ_POSTED which is arldy having the definition. So we can implement BADI for that definition so there is no problem.

regards

laxman

Re: BADI Implementation vs Definition...

Fabio777-hub — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:58:08 GMT

Many thanks.

regards

Fabio