<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance issue in SELECT query in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810778#M1881816</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using FOR ALL ENTRIES with big volumn of data you MUST insure to provide some leading keys (primary or from index) else performance will get very poor as you already know now...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you execute a SQL trace thru ST05 to analyze system behavior, execute your report with trace on, then&amp;nbsp; stop trace and display trace, execute explain on the OPEN step : If there is no customer index on VBAK in your system with keys kunag, vkorg or bstnk, system will almost certainly perform a full-scan of the table... for each generated subset of values (and those subset usually only group a small handfull of values) &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cry" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/cry.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also there is a FAQ note on OSS : &lt;A href="http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/185530" title="185530  - Performance: Customer developments in SD"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="title"&gt;185530 - Performance: Customer developments in SD&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, did you read it, this note suggest to use VAKPA to identify sales orders with customer/partner information (and VKPMA to identify deliveries, VAPMA for order by material... &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raymond&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RaymondGiuseppi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-14T08:01:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810771#M1881809</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been facing a performance issue in the below query . Please let me know your suggestions. The number of records in ITAB is around 7500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SELECT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; k~vbeln k~auart k~vkorg p_posnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbak AS k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INNER JOIN&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbap AS p ON p~vbeln = k~vbeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INTO TABLE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; it_output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WHERE K~vbeln ne itab-vbeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~kunnr&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-kunag&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~vkorg&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-vkorg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~bstnk&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-bstnk.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;gt;Timeout error&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried to put ITAB-VBELN values in a range table and tried with the following query. Still the same issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SELECT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; k~vbeln k~auart k~vkorg p_posnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbak AS k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INNER JOIN&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbap AS p ON p~vbeln = k~vbeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INTO TABLE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; it_output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WHERE K~vbeln not in ITAB_VBELN_RANGE_TABLE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~kunnr&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-kunag&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~vkorg&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-vkorg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~bstnk&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-bstnk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried the following variation. But no improvement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SELECT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; k~vbeln k~auart k~vkorg p_posnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbak AS k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INNER JOIN&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbap AS p ON p~vbeln = k~vbeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INTO TABLE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; it_output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WHERE&amp;nbsp; k~kunnr&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-kunag&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~vkorg&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-vkorg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~bstnk&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-bstnk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DELETE it_output WHERE vbeln in&amp;nbsp; ITAB_VBELN_RANGE_TABLE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810771#M1881809</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T18:17:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810772#M1881810</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the sentence "For all entries in..." does not work with tables overs 1.000 data...the performance goes down a lot and dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try to avoid it, maybe make another join using the itab...or loop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Miguel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810772#M1881810</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T18:52:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810773#M1881811</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;FOR ALL ENTRIES with large tables is fine. The real problem is with the NE ITAB-VBELN. The NE means that you probably won't use an index.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can leave that condition off the SELECT and than process the internal table to get rid of entries you don't want.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810773#M1881811</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T19:00:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810774#M1881812</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I spoke too soon. I see your option 3 is approximately what I am suggesting. There is an index on KUNNR, but it is not active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:35:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810774#M1881812</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T19:35:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810775#M1881813</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;SELECT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; k~vbeln k~auart k~vkorg p_posnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbak AS k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INNER JOIN&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vbap AS p ON p~vbeln = k~vbeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; INTO TABLE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; it_output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WHERE K~vbeln ne itab-vbeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~kunnr&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-kunag&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~vkorg&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-vkorg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AND k~bstnk&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;nbsp; itab-bstnk.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; =&amp;gt;Timeout error&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;do not use “NE”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;1st, get all the data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 12px; color: #333333; background: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #333333; font-family: arial;"&gt;2nd, delete data according to itab&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810775#M1881813</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-14T06:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810776#M1881814</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can try for sub query. But not sure of the performance. Sample code below. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Select * into table lt_agr_users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from agr_users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where agr_name = any ( select distinct role from ZTABLE). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810776#M1881814</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-14T07:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810777#M1881815</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Selva,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try using VAPMA table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Harsh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810777#M1881815</guid>
      <dc:creator>harshsisodia31</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-14T07:44:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810778#M1881816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using FOR ALL ENTRIES with big volumn of data you MUST insure to provide some leading keys (primary or from index) else performance will get very poor as you already know now...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you execute a SQL trace thru ST05 to analyze system behavior, execute your report with trace on, then&amp;nbsp; stop trace and display trace, execute explain on the OPEN step : If there is no customer index on VBAK in your system with keys kunag, vkorg or bstnk, system will almost certainly perform a full-scan of the table... for each generated subset of values (and those subset usually only group a small handfull of values) &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cry" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/cry.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also there is a FAQ note on OSS : &lt;A href="http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/185530" title="185530  - Performance: Customer developments in SD"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="title"&gt;185530 - Performance: Customer developments in SD&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, did you read it, this note suggest to use VAKPA to identify sales orders with customer/partner information (and VKPMA to identify deliveries, VAPMA for order by material... &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raymond&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810778#M1881816</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaymondGiuseppi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-14T08:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance issue in SELECT query</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810779#M1881817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you describe the required selection logic? Having an ITAB with coherent rows of selection values, of which three represent an EQ and a forth one an NE condition seems unusual to me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VAPMA is not the right one, you can look at table VAKPA to replace VBAK in your selection, this one is sorted by partner numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:01:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-in-select-query/m-p/10810779#M1881817</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-14T08:01:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

