<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance Issue Table VICDCOND - REFX in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761387#M1876834</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are performance notes for &lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;RE-FX and related BW extractors until 2014, so perform an OSS note for your system level.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;NB: I agree with the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/people/newbie.sap"&gt;Newbie&lt;/A&gt;” &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro_emoticon jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, for standard program performance, always start with an OSS search.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;Raymond&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RaymondGiuseppi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-01T15:04:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Issue Table VICDCOND - REFX</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761385#M1876832</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need some advice!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a 2 select query on VICDCOND which should use index 6&amp;amp;9( provided by SAP), however they are not being used in select statement. Instead the DB goes for FULL TABLE SCAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Query 1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;SELECT &lt;/SPAN&gt;intreno &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;FROM &lt;/SPAN&gt;vicdcond &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;APPENDING &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;TABLE &lt;/SPAN&gt;lt_intreno&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;WHERE &lt;/SPAN&gt;objnrdistpara = id_objnr &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;AND&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; conddelete&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; = abap_false.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Query 2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;SELECT &lt;/SPAN&gt;intreno objnr &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;FROM &lt;/SPAN&gt;vicdcond&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;INTO &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;TABLE &lt;/SPAN&gt;lt_cond_int&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;FOR &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;ALL &lt;/SPAN&gt;ENTRIES &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;IN &lt;/SPAN&gt;lt_hier&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;WHERE &lt;/SPAN&gt;calcrule = lt_hier-calcruleext.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The above query goes for full table scan even though index exist for CALCRULE(Index 9) and for objnrdistpara &amp;amp; conddelete(Index 6).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We even for DB stats updated but even that didn't change the result. Please share your thought on next course of action.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anyone aware of performance issues related to REFX or table VICDCOND or any other SAP Notes that might help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS : Both the queries are part of standard code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chirantan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761385#M1876832</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-27T09:40:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Issue Table VICDCOND - REFX</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761386#M1876833</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chiratan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if this is part of standard program, I think you should 1st check SAPNET OSS notes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;Maybe some notes correcting this already exist.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;Try to search with VCDCOND + Performance or the standard program name + performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;If the index are not used even after stats were calculated again, then it means maybe that the stats of the table+index lead the DB&amp;nbsp; to that choice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;So for example if the index 9 has very few disctinct values, and this table is big, then maybe DB will go to a full scan instead to use an index which seems not efficient for it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;So maybe check the stats of the table &amp;amp; index .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;And check if really these index will be better than full scans.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know this table size on your systems. But "full scan" is not equal to "bad" &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you notice that these full scans are long ?&amp;nbsp; Or just trying to avoid full scans ? (because we all always read that "full scan" is bad).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How much time is spend on these SELECTs ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S.N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="j-post-author"&gt;&lt;BR class="active_link jiveTT-hover-user jive-username-link" data-avatarid="-1" data-externalid="" data-presence="null" data-userid="33589" data-username="chirantan.chanana" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761386#M1876833</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-01T14:50:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Issue Table VICDCOND - REFX</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761387#M1876834</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are performance notes for &lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;RE-FX and related BW extractors until 2014, so perform an OSS note for your system level.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;NB: I agree with the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://answers.sap.com/people/newbie.sap"&gt;Newbie&lt;/A&gt;” &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro_emoticon jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1103/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, for standard program performance, always start with an OSS search.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="urtxtstd"&gt;Raymond&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-issue-table-vicdcond-refx/m-p/10761387#M1876834</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaymondGiuseppi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-01T15:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

