topic Re: F.01 restriction based on Company Code in Application Development and Automation Discussions

F.01 restriction based on Company Code

va_joshi — Wed, 14 May 2014 05:25:32 GMT

Hi Team,

We wants to restrict the use of F.01 tcode based on the company code but i don't see any object where i can restrict this.

Please provide any solution for this

Regards

Narinder

Re: F.01 restriction based on Company Code

Former Member — Wed, 14 May 2014 06:12:10 GMT

Hi,

F.01 is not restricted on Company code by standard.

You have to do one of below to achieve this,

Search if there is any user exit available to build it, so you can insert the check on company code in standard logic.
Create transaction variant ZF.01 and insert a check in Z as modification to standard one is not recommended.

Hope this helps.

BR,

Mangesh

Re: F.01 restriction based on Company Code

Colleen — Wed, 14 May 2014 08:20:17 GMT

Hi Narinder/V A Joshi

Can transaction FC10N be used instead?

Looking at SE93 definitions, F.01 uses program RFBILA00 and FC10N uses program RFBILA00N. It looks like FC10N is the new version (I thought a lot of the F.* transactions were replaced).

Can you confirm with functional team if the FC10N transaction should be used instead of F.01? You should then be able to restrict on object F_BKPF_BUK.

Regards

Colleen

Re: F.01 restriction based on Company Code

va_joshi — Wed, 14 May 2014 08:47:01 GMT

Thanks Lee n Mangesh for your reply.

@ Mangesh: I have asked my ABAPPER to look into the Exit screen.

@Coleen: II'll check with my functional team on FC10N and i'll also check whether there is any auth object for company code

Regards

Re: F.01 restriction based on Company Code

jaydalwadi — Wed, 14 May 2014 09:06:01 GMT

AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'TCODE'

ID 'TCD' FIELD c_tcode.

ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.

IF sy-subrc = 0.

end if.

Re: F.01 restriction based on Company Code

Colleen — Wed, 14 May 2014 10:14:44 GMT

Hi Jay

What is this going to achieve? What is the authorisation Object TCODE? Did you mean S_TCODE auth object and if so it does not have field ACTVT?

Regards

Colleen