topic Re: Availability based on minimum shelf life in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Availability based on minimum shelf life

Former Member — Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:58:11 GMT

In 'VL01N ' t code batches are selected based on the parameter value 'LOBM_RLZ(min. shelf life)'.

I have an requirement in which this minimum shelf life is also maintained in LIPS table (LIPS-ZZVSD_MVZ).

If this field is maintained with some value which is different to tha parameter value LOBM_RLZ, then batches

should be selected according to this value. Else needs to be selected as per LOBM_RLZ.

Kindly help me to find out the exit to write the code and how can I overwrite parameter value LOBM_RLZ?

Re: Availability based on minimum shelf life

eduardo_hinojosa — Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:13:07 GMT

Try with USEREXIT_BATCH_DETERMINATION in include MV50AFZZ.

In the other hand, see SAP Note 619911 - FAQ: Batch determination

I hope this helps you

Regards

Eduardo

Re: Availability based on minimum shelf life

Former Member — Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:27:30 GMT

Hi hinojosa,

Thanks for your quick response.

Exit provied by you looks fine to write the code.

But I'm not able to find the exact place where i need to overwrite the value of parameter LOBM value with LIPS z field value.

Can you please help in this?

Regards,

Nikhil

Re: Availability based on minimum shelf life

eduardo_hinojosa — Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:55:39 GMT

Maybe I didn't understand you in a beginning. If you want to use a customer field for determination of batch, see the IMG path and consider to add a customer field in the determination of batch. See this IMG path in Logistics - General

After, in V/C1, for strategy types, you can define your own VOFM (maybe this way will be more productive because the userexit is for setting a different batch) and set it (as in other cases, set a break point for understanding how it works)

I hope this helps you

Regards

Eduardo

PD: I forgot it. There is a BADI, but I've never worked with it. See VB_BD_SELECTION method RESTRICT_CONF_CHARS, but I doubt it heps you