<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Commit Work only for ONE Table in LUW in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912899#M1794152</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do the modify in a remote call and commit there.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Honestly the overhead is pretty small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-06T16:48:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Commit Work only for ONE Table in LUW</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912898#M1794151</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Colleagues,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an application that runs in the sidepanel (mainly for additional information on top of what the main applications&amp;nbsp; provides) . I Want to update my statistics (how often was I called , something executed and so on)&amp;nbsp; -&amp;gt; problem: If I do so the commit comes very late -&amp;gt; other users / processes wait for the LOCK to be gone (after the modify TABLE).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot&amp;nbsp; commit work right after the modify, because I do not want to commit data from the application that called me (in the sidepanel) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my first shot was&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;MODIFY /bcv/d_sstat connection &lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;lc_db_conn&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;FROM &lt;/SPAN&gt;ls_statistic&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;COMMIT &lt;/SPAN&gt;CONNECTION &lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;lc_db_conn&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;BUT: the connection had to be maintained in DBCON - &amp;gt; so I cannot deliver that because every system has own DB connections.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;Second Shot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;&amp;nbsp; calling a function Module starting new TASK &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt; but that seems to me to much of an "overhead" just for that&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;Is there a quick and clean way to achieve that ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S52"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="L0S55"&gt;Thanks Marcus&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912898#M1794151</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member218191</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-06T16:25:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commit Work only for ONE Table in LUW</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912899#M1794152</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do the modify in a remote call and commit there.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Honestly the overhead is pretty small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912899#M1794152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-06T16:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commit Work only for ONE Table in LUW</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912900#M1794153</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Neal, that is what I wrote down under "Second Shot" isnt it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks Marcus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/commit-work-only-for-one-table-in-luw/m-p/9912900#M1794153</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member218191</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-06T16:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

