<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance for nested loop of different structured tables. in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683572#M1767390</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been searching over the internet for my problem but haven't found the right solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My query is how do you improve performance in a Nested loop of tables that don't have any shared field. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found a lot of stuff over the internet for improving performance with Parallel Cursor but they are all using the same field in both the tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my case the two tables do not have any common field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if anyone has an idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Piyush.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-04T07:43:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance for nested loop of different structured tables.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683572#M1767390</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been searching over the internet for my problem but haven't found the right solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My query is how do you improve performance in a Nested loop of tables that don't have any shared field. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found a lot of stuff over the internet for improving performance with Parallel Cursor but they are all using the same field in both the tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my case the two tables do not have any common field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if anyone has an idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Piyush.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683572#M1767390</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-04T07:43:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance for nested loop of different structured tables.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683573#M1767391</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Piyush,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your tables have no relation (no common fields that restrict the range to be searched for the inner table of the nested loop), the number of loop-steps has to be m times n, where m and n are the number of entries in the two tables. This cannot be speed up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another question is: what type of business process is it to mix to tables with no common fields?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And how many entries do the tables have?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards, Randolf&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:03:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683573#M1767391</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member184455</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-04T15:03:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance for nested loop of different structured tables.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683574#M1767392</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This message was moderated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-for-nested-loop-of-different-structured-tables/m-p/9683574#M1767392</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-05T04:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

