<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic why bapi buffer isn't in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-bapi-buffer-isn-t/m-p/9575446#M1755933</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello experts!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in this document: &lt;A class="active_link" href="http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT+versus+COMMIT+WORK" title="http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT+versus+COMMIT+WORK"&gt;http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT+versus+COMMIT+WORK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it says " Now, as only CALL FUNCTION IN UPDATE TASK should be used, it makes obsolete this documentation and the need for storing data in memory. But buffer is still in use as I explained above."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it makes no sence because without the buffer it is not possible to use a sequence of bapis without commit because the data is not in the database and its needed to check data in the buffer ( for exemple BAPI_CHANGE changes field X to 1 and BAPI_CHANGE2 checks that field X equals 1 before update another field),, UPDATE TASK isn't relating data that hasn't been commited yet.. so why do they say BUFFER is not needed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 18:11:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-02T18:11:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why bapi buffer isn't</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-bapi-buffer-isn-t/m-p/9575446#M1755933</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello experts!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in this document: &lt;A class="active_link" href="http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT+versus+COMMIT+WORK" title="http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT+versus+COMMIT+WORK"&gt;http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT+versus+COMMIT+WORK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it says " Now, as only CALL FUNCTION IN UPDATE TASK should be used, it makes obsolete this documentation and the need for storing data in memory. But buffer is still in use as I explained above."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it makes no sence because without the buffer it is not possible to use a sequence of bapis without commit because the data is not in the database and its needed to check data in the buffer ( for exemple BAPI_CHANGE changes field X to 1 and BAPI_CHANGE2 checks that field X equals 1 before update another field),, UPDATE TASK isn't relating data that hasn't been commited yet.. so why do they say BUFFER is not needed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 18:11:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-bapi-buffer-isn-t/m-p/9575446#M1755933</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-02T18:11:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why bapi buffer isn't</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-bapi-buffer-isn-t/m-p/9575447#M1755934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The article says buffer is needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It mentions 3 things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;BAPI and need to use BAPI commit or BAPI rollback.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Old way of doing Perform on Commit, for which global variables had to be maintained.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Call Function..Update Task&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last line says point 2 is obsolete, and hence global variables need not be maintained.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 14:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-bapi-buffer-isn-t/m-p/9575447#M1755934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-03T14:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

