topic Re: SAP note not de-implemented successfully in Application Development and Automation Discussions

SAP note not de-implemented successfully

Former Member — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:40:19 GMT

Hi Experts,

Not sure if this is the right forum to post since my query is related to SAP BASIS note implementation.

An SAP note (in this case 1546072) was implemented by BASIS and was later decided to be removed.

I am not sure if the removal ended in warnings but the note presently shows as de-implemented in SNOTE.

however changes still show in FM ISU_INSTLN_FACTS_IN_MOVE which is leading to inconsistency and we presently aren't able to run billing transactions that require fact updates.

the issue which appears is this note has inserted an extra parameter in the perform statement for 'delete_operands' not there in the definition of the form.

we've tried reimplementing then deimplementing the note to set it straight but due to this inconsistency it won't even allow re-implementing it.

Please suggest.

Thanks,

Arindam.

Re: SAP note not de-implemented successfully

Former Member — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:48:04 GMT

If de-implementing the note doesn't remove the changes, then the only way to go forward is to obtain access key from SAP and revert the changes and make the object identical to its previous version (i.e., before note implementation).

It is important to check all the objects that were touched by this note and confirm that they all are identical to the versions prior to implementation of this note.

This sort of thing happened once in our system and this is the only way which was left (as suggested by SAP) to rectify it since de-implementing the note doesn't rectify the issue.

Best regards,

Vishnu Tallapragada

Re: SAP note not de-implemented successfully

ThomasZloch — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:48:58 GMT

<removed after reading the post carefully>

Thomas

Re: SAP note not de-implemented successfully

Former Member — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:02:51 GMT

Thanks Vishnu,

I was thinking on the same lines but wasn't sure if that was the only way out. moreover, thanks for reminding the fact that we need to check all objects affected by the note.

Will check this out and get back.

regards,

Arindam.