<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Better replacement for Obsolete statement in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487853#M1652962</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can use - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;struc1 = struc2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-19T10:44:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Better replacement for Obsolete statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487852#M1652961</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;During upgradation to ECC 6.0 , at many places in order to correct the Unicode error we need to use the Move statement. Since the Move-Corresponding is an obsolete statement now , so we can't use it any more. It is  very difficult and highly time consuming to move huge structures and internal tables field by field . Is there any alternative to this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487852#M1652961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-19T10:30:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better replacement for Obsolete statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487853#M1652962</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can use - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;struc1 = struc2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487853#M1652962</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-19T10:44:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better replacement for Obsolete statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487854#M1652963</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes , we can use that way . BUT it will take a lot of time if there are 250 fields of different structures needed to be moved . Thats the problem.There is not a single program where I have to remediate like this . Minimum 20 programs. So I was looking for a way more useful and less time consuming in such a scenario .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:37:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487854#M1652963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-19T11:37:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better replacement for Obsolete statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487855#M1652964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Move-Corresponding is an obsolete statement now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Who said ????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;at many places in order to correct the Unicode error we need to use the Move statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What type of error ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/better-replacement-for-obsolete-statement/m-p/8487855#M1652964</guid>
      <dc:creator>kesavadas_thekkillath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-19T11:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

