<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maintaining Common Authorization Object? in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032891#M1609998</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lots of searches for these and a few options to choose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try SU01D instead as a starter..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or search! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit - Display su01 and create option for pfcg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is for PRD then have a think (SoD for users and access to PFCG S_USER_SAS)- if for DEV then I'm stuck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: David Berry on Jul 25, 2011 7:40 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-25T18:12:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maintaining Common Authorization Object?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032890#M1609997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question may be simple but i need the right clarification.i am adding 2 tcodes(su01 $ pfcg).We are having the common authorization objects b/w these 2 tcodes(s_user_agr,s_user_pro,s_user_grp,s_user_auth).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But,when am creating a role with these tcodes the field values of these common authorization objects a clubbing together am changing the activity of any field its reflecting in both the tcodes because its a common auth object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, i want only display option for su01 and create option for pfcg.but both the tcodes must be in same role.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THANKS in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032890#M1609997</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-25T17:49:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintaining Common Authorization Object?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032891#M1609998</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lots of searches for these and a few options to choose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try SU01D instead as a starter..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or search! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit - Display su01 and create option for pfcg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is for PRD then have a think (SoD for users and access to PFCG S_USER_SAS)- if for DEV then I'm stuck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: David Berry on Jul 25, 2011 7:40 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032891#M1609998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-25T18:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintaining Common Authorization Object?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032892#M1609999</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enabling the switch in table PRGN_CUST will help you to achieve this. Refer SAP Note 312682.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raghu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032892#M1609999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-25T19:03:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintaining Common Authorization Object?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032893#M1610000</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Raghu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We might be confusing the request?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Display access to SU01 and create access to PFCG was the scenario&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's why I asked about PRD or DEV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DEV display SU01 and create PFCG doesn't make sense to me and in PRD it would be the reverse? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S_USER_SAS and (if needed depending on the release) changing the two entries in SM30 allow create access to SU01 and display access to PFCG except for the users tab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyhoo..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I like Anyhoo)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's wait and see what transpires..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;@abhichandan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;but both the tcodes must be in same role&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;whether at role or user level the shared objects merge - SAP likes to re-use objects - shared objects are cool &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: David Berry on Jul 25, 2011 8:24 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032893#M1610000</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-25T19:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintaining Common Authorization Object?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032894#M1610001</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is wrong with s_user_grp? For assignment make necessary check in custom table to activate the activity 22 for role assignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited : What makes you wake up in the afternoon?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arpan Paik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: P Arpan on Jul 26, 2011 11:36 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/maintaining-common-authorization-object/m-p/8032894#M1610001</guid>
      <dc:creator>arpan_paik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-26T06:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

