<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cost Elements / IDocs in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cost-elements-idocs/m-p/7762049#M1583722</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am creating cost elements in ECC via inbound IDoc type COELEM01.  I am not sure how to differentiate between primary and secondary cost elements.  Any clues?  When I try to post a journal entry I get the following error:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Do not use cost element xxxxxxxxx for CO Through-postings from FI"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on that error message it seems as though the Primary Cost Element is getting mistaken for a Secondary Cost Element.  Does anyone know if there is any particular flag or setting on the IDoc that would differentiate between primary and seconday?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-30T15:05:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cost Elements / IDocs</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cost-elements-idocs/m-p/7762049#M1583722</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am creating cost elements in ECC via inbound IDoc type COELEM01.  I am not sure how to differentiate between primary and secondary cost elements.  Any clues?  When I try to post a journal entry I get the following error:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Do not use cost element xxxxxxxxx for CO Through-postings from FI"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on that error message it seems as though the Primary Cost Element is getting mistaken for a Secondary Cost Element.  Does anyone know if there is any particular flag or setting on the IDoc that would differentiate between primary and seconday?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cost-elements-idocs/m-p/7762049#M1583722</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-30T15:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost Elements / IDocs</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cost-elements-idocs/m-p/7762050#M1583723</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not really an ABAP question. You might want to ask in FI or EDI forum instead. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you know what field the secondary/primary indicator is stored in, you can search for the same field in the IDoc documentation. Usually the field names are the same in the IDoc and database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:49:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/cost-elements-idocs/m-p/7762050#M1583723</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jelena_Perfiljeva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-30T16:49:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

