<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Another question on analysis authorizations in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734981#M1581304</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Krysta,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suppose you can maintain range of values with wildcard for infoarea field in S_RS_COMP so as to exclude the infoarea you want (although this could become a maintainence nightmare later on). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alternately, if you are in design phase, I would suggest proper naming convention to be followed for queries and then restrict based on query naming convention via S_RS_COMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sandipan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-15T14:28:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Another question on analysis authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734978#M1581301</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're trying to figure out a relatively straightforward way to secure people out of HR flavored data in BW. One option we're considering is analysis authorizations. I had high hopes of being able to exclude access to an infoarea, but it appears that that is not allowed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that true? Are you only able to include infoareas? I'm trying to use characteristic 0TCTIFAREA for this and am finding that the only option I get is to include ... not so much on the exclude.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Krysta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734978#M1581301</guid>
      <dc:creator>krysta_osborn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T20:38:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Another question on analysis authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734979#M1581302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can rather restrict at role level via auth object S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1 (for author specific access). Field RSINFOAREA is the one you require to put the restriction. Corresponding Analysis authorizations can be restricted starting from Infoproviders and other auth relevant characteristics/key figures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sandipan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734979#M1581302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T04:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Another question on analysis authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734980#M1581303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sandipan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response. We do currently restrict on infoarea in the role. However, it has the same problem as what I was trying to solve by using analysis auths. You can't EXCLUDE values. You have to specifically list what the user can see vs. what they can't see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that for certain characteristics - infoprovider, infoarea, etc. - the analysis auths are coded not to allow you to exclude values. They only allow you to include values. Boo!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Krysta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734980#M1581303</guid>
      <dc:creator>krysta_osborn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T13:58:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Another question on analysis authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734981#M1581304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Krysta,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suppose you can maintain range of values with wildcard for infoarea field in S_RS_COMP so as to exclude the infoarea you want (although this could become a maintainence nightmare later on). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alternately, if you are in design phase, I would suggest proper naming convention to be followed for queries and then restrict based on query naming convention via S_RS_COMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sandipan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734981#M1581304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T14:28:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Another question on analysis authorizations</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734982#M1581305</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are WAY past the design phase. : )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess we just need to pick which option we like better - restricting via the role or analysis auth - since neither one appears to be easier than the other from a maintenance standpoint .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Krysta&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:34:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/another-question-on-analysis-authorizations/m-p/7734982#M1581305</guid>
      <dc:creator>krysta_osborn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T14:34:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

