<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance problems with the AUSP table. in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705961#M1578551</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;we also have severe performance problems with this table although all relevant index are available&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/902003" height="18" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it's just a matter of size of the table. We have no idea how to improve on accelearte the search with Transaction cv04n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-07T13:56:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance problems with the AUSP table.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705956#M1578546</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi masters,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in my prog am using the AUSP SELECT like this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT SINGLE * FROM ausp WHERE objek EQ ausp_objek AND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                                atinn EQ cabn-atinn.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and when used the TRACE I see that this select statement duration is    &lt;STRONG&gt;350.930&lt;/STRONG&gt; which is in RED color.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can i improve this select pls?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jacob.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705956#M1578546</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member317781</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-02T07:33:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problems with the AUSP table.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705957#M1578547</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is probably not your problem,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+Repeat several times, before you execute the trace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+Summarize the trace (trace - summarize by SQL statements), what is your total DB time and what are the most expensive statements?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705957#M1578547</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-02T08:26:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problems with the AUSP table.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705958#M1578548</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jacob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check if you can also add KLART to your query so it will use an better index (N3?)  My experience is that the KLART field normally is a cosntant depending on the scope of your requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe also look at your trace which index it is using.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705958#M1578548</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-02T16:07:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problems with the AUSP table.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705959#M1578549</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jacob,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;generally AUSP table is not taking time to execute query. plz check your trace again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;although you can add KLART andATZHL for filteration criteria and make index for this four field &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ( objek, atinn,atzhl and klart ). after that execute again..It will be not taking time to execute query.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kunjan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705959#M1578549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T07:19:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problems with the AUSP table.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705960#M1578550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same problem. How do you solve it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fidel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705960#M1578550</guid>
      <dc:creator>fidel_fernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-20T15:20:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problems with the AUSP table.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705961#M1578551</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;we also have severe performance problems with this table although all relevant index are available&lt;IMG class="migrated-image" src="https://community.sap.com/legacyfs/online/storage/attachments/storage/7/jiveimages/902003" height="18" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it's just a matter of size of the table. We have no idea how to improve on accelearte the search with Transaction cv04n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problems-with-the-ausp-table/m-p/7705961#M1578551</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-07T13:56:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

