topic Re: authorization for a perticular single table.......................... in Application Development and Automation Discussions

authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:38:06 GMT

i got this error

you are not authorized to maintain /VIRSA/ZVFFIDS table

how to give this authorization for perticular table only to the user...........................?

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

arpan_paik — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:27:16 GMT

Littile search in SDN will give you many information on this topic

regards,

Arpan Paik

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

koehntopp — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:49:18 GMT

This table should not be manually maintained. It contains the user IDs for GRC Superuser Privilege Management.

Assign the proper GRC SPM Role (/VIRSA/Z_VFAT_ADMINISTRATOR) and maintain the users in the application.

Frank.

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:50:42 GMT

thanks frank

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:48:39 GMT

Hi Chinni,

There is a particler authorization object is missed (grcff_0001 with activity 02). These objectes are presented in the Virsa sefault roles like(/VIRSA/FF_DEFAULT_ROLE), asiign the role to particluer user and search/maintained fire fighter owners in the /VIRSA/ZVIRFFIDS table.

Regards,

Arjuna.

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:41:46 GMT

haiiii frank....

i assigned these roles to firefighter owner /virsa/z_vfat_administrator and sm30

but it shows that "" you don't have authorization to maintain /virsa/zvirffids display only""

if igive only /virsa/z_vfat_administrator it shows ""you are not authorized to maintain /virsa/zvirffids"

thanks in advance

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

koehntopp — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:37:50 GMT

The roles have been generated properly...?

The table does have the correct authorization groups assigned?

What is your VIRSANH/VIRSAHR SP level?

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:01:22 GMT

haiii Frank...........

the roles are genrated properley

i applied only VIRSANH only its level is VIRSANH530_700

is it necessary to add VIRSAHR

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:35:41 GMT

please copy paste all the FF configuration values....

also check Admin role and check if S_TABU_DIS is there with correct auth group

Regards,

Surpreet

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

koehntopp — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:49:51 GMT

Again, what is the SP level of VIRSANH530_700 ?

Can you please do an ST01 authorization trace and tell us which check exactly is failing?

Frank.

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:02:26 GMT

which auth group we havee to give in s_tabu_dis.....?

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

koehntopp — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:24:38 GMT

It would be a lot easier to help you if you would do what we ask... we're not too good at guessing...

Re: authorization for a perticular single table..........................

Former Member — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:57:57 GMT

the above problem is resolved by giveing grcff authorization to the owner manually but log report is not getting...

my error is ""Submit authoriztionZVFATV01 required for program /virsa/zvfat_v01""

here i given that authorization but log report not getting.............?

Edited by: chinnisap on Jan 27, 2011 6:59 PM