The ASSERT condition was violated

Former Member — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:54:49 GMT

Hi Gentleman,

I am trying to Execute a BAPI to add an Inpayment agreement to a loan account. So in order to add the inpayment agreement , i need to use to BAPI in sequence.

BAPI_BCA_ACCOUNT_CHANGE -

> to bring the account in Change Mode

BAPI_BCA_INPAYMENT_AGR_CHANGE -

> to add the in payment agreement,

i get the dump with follwoing description while executing second BAPI

Short text

The ASSERT condition was violated.

What happened?

In the running application program, the ASSERT statement recognized a

situation that should not have occurred.

The runtime error was triggered for one of these reasons:

- For the checkpoint group specified with the ASSERT statement, the

activation mode is set to "abort".

- Via a system variant, the activation mode is globally set to "abort"

for checkpoint groups in this system.

- The activation mode is set to "abort" on program level.

- The ASSERT statement is not assigned to any checkpoint group.

Error analysis

The following checkpoint group was used: "No checkpoint group specified"

If in the ASSERT statement the addition FIELDS was used, you can find

the content of the first 8 specified fields in the following overview:

" (not used) "

16 * Change payment advice

17 loop at i_new_pymt_adv assigning <new_line>.

18 loop at <new_line>-pymt_adv_data assigning <new_item>.

19 append initial line to lt_pymt_adv assigning <pymt_adv>.

>>>>> assert <new_item>-chind is not initial.

21 move-corresponding <new_line> to <pymt_adv>.

22 move-corresponding <new_item> to <pymt_adv>.

23 if <pymt_adv>-pymt_adv_type is initial.

24 /fspam/_pymt_adv_read_api=>get_cust_pymt_adv_type(

25 exporting

26 i_pymt_adv_catg = <pymt_adv>-pymt_adv_catg

27 i_direction = <pymt_adv>-pymt_adv_dir

28 importing

29 e_pymt_adv_type = lt_pymt_adv_type

30 ).

Kindly Suggest,

Regards,

Nikesh

Re: The ASSERT condition was violated

Former Member — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:44:38 GMT

Anyone to help on this please?

topic Re: The ASSERT condition was violated in Application Development and Automation Discussions

The ASSERT condition was violated

Re: The ASSERT condition was violated