<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Direct Table Updates in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516507#M1560131</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Se11 if the tables is allowed for maintain then you should be able to modify the table. If you give access to se16n then big problem for you as all tables you can modify using se16n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-17T16:35:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516506#M1560130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone point me to a list of all Sap delivered transactions that allow a user to directly update tables?  I have thought about using table USOBT and finding all transactions where su24 sticks s_tabu_dis  with 02 into the role, I am hoping there are flaws with this line of thought because that comes back with a ton of transactions and monitoring them all would be difficult.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I may also be thinking about this incorrectly, is there a way to monitor direct table updates system wide without having to use GRC to monitor each transaction?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516506#M1560130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-17T16:16:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516507#M1560131</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Se11 if the tables is allowed for maintain then you should be able to modify the table. If you give access to se16n then big problem for you as all tables you can modify using se16n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516507#M1560131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-17T16:35:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516508#M1560132</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; In Se11 if the tables is allowed for maintain then you should be able to modify the table. If you give access to se16n then big problem for you as all tables you can modify using se16n.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will struggle to maintain table KBEROBJ with SE16N.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516508#M1560132</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-17T17:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516509#M1560133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SE11 with S_DEVELOP 01 or 02 is needed but the user also needs a developer key in production (DEVACCESS - not likely we hope...) and the user needs SE11_OLD (called immediately) and SCC4 has to be used to open the client. edit(better add we are on an old 4.6C just in case this is specific to my client)edit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apart from that SE16N's little &amp;amp;thingy should have been fixed according to Julius in another thread recently?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: David Berry on Nov 17, 2010 5:34 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:33:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516509#M1560133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-17T17:33:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516510#M1560134</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Waldon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would go with a different approach for your situation. I would generate a report using SUIM with all the roles  having &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S_Tabu_DIs with change option and then check  the list of users having them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Venkatesh.K&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516510#M1560134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-19T11:50:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516511#M1560135</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I ask what table(s) they want to perform the direct table update on?  Are they custom tables, or are they SAP tables? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;May be silly for stating the obvious, but direct table updates can be very dangerous. Why wouldn't you either call transaction or bapi? Abap would have to build it.. so it is more overhead, but much safer.  Just a thought&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:14:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516511#M1560135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-26T14:14:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Table Updates</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516512#M1560136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can try table TSTPV. The field "Parameter" defines if the transaction is a variant of another transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, if for eg, you need a list of all SM30 transaction variants, search for &lt;STRONG&gt;SM30&lt;/STRONG&gt;Update* in Parameter field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:32:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/direct-table-updates/m-p/7516512#M1560136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-27T07:32:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

