<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Explicit Source Code Enhancements - INCLUDE BOUND &amp; Implementation Order in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448304#M1552600</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bharani,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel too, that we cannot control the implementation/exection sequence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;About the first point (INCLUDE BOUND), my question was:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do we define an enhancement option (ENHANCEMENT-POINT) as INCLUDE BOUND?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-16T11:52:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Explicit Source Code Enhancements - INCLUDE BOUND &amp; Implementation Order</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448302#M1552598</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two queries on explicit source code enhancements:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) While defining an explicit enhancement option (ENHANCEMENT-POINT) in an Include program, how do I set up the INCLUDE BOUND addition? The pop-up only gives the STATIC addition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I have an explicit enhancement option (ENHANCEMENT-POINT), for which I want to write an implementation. However, there is aleady an implementation for the ENHANCEMENT-POINT written by someone else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I create my own implementation, it is coming above the existing one. So my new implementation executes before the existing implementation. However, I want my new implementation to come below the existing one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I change the order (sequence) of the implementations?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:12:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448302#M1552598</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-15T13:12:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Explicit Source Code Enhancements - INCLUDE BOUND &amp; Implementation Order</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448303#M1552599</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Explicit enhancement points and sections that allow you to enhance or replace the DECLARATIONS are called STATIC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source code enhance or replace are called DYNAMIC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think we can't control the order of implementation if we have the multiple implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bharani&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448303#M1552599</guid>
      <dc:creator>BH2408</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-16T11:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Explicit Source Code Enhancements - INCLUDE BOUND &amp; Implementation Order</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448304#M1552600</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bharani,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel too, that we cannot control the implementation/exection sequence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;About the first point (INCLUDE BOUND), my question was:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do we define an enhancement option (ENHANCEMENT-POINT) as INCLUDE BOUND?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448304#M1552600</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-16T11:52:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Explicit Source Code Enhancements - INCLUDE BOUND &amp; Implementation Order</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448305#M1552601</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create two main programs named ZMAIN1 ZMAIN2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create one include program named ZINCLUDE1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add one subroutine named 'abc' to ZINCLUDE1 (FORM abc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add 'INCLUDE ZINCLUDE1.'&amp;nbsp; to top of ZMAIN1 and ZMAIN2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Call subroutine(perform abc ..) from ZMAIN1 and ZMAIN2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Compile these two main programs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Start tcode se38 and change ZINCLUDE1. Try to add explicit enhancement option in subroutine abc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This enhancement option is now INCLUDE BOUNDED .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can create more enhancement options and all will be INCLUDE BOUNDED.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because se38 does not ask a main program to change ZINCLUDE1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If you try to change ZINCLUDE1 by double-clicking it from ZMAIN1 (ZMAIN2) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can not create INCLUDE BOUNDED enhancement.Because editor knows that you are coming from ZMAIN1(ZMAIN2) and tries to create non-include bounded enhancement option that will be used only by ZMAIN1 (ZMAIN2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/explicit-source-code-enhancements-include-bound-implementation-order/m-p/7448305#M1552601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-10T15:06:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

