<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Function group / Function modules approvals in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/function-group-function-modules-approvals/m-p/7270694#M1530066</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well you should test function groups and function module coding as per your normal procedures. They are widely used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whether they are accessible depends on your roles, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which release are you on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prior release 7.01 you can only control at function group level with object S_RFC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subsequently you can use RFC_TYPE 'FUNC' to control at module name level if FUGR fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luckily, this check is central and to my knowledge only one developer ever hardcoded it for list outputs, so you should be okay to convert for manual authorizations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For standard ones from the menu, you will need to deactivate S_RFC (there is not option to un-merge, unfortunately..........). Easiest is to get the names from the menu and paste them into the manual authorization, or use a Su24 "dummy" for the role or scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dummy's are usefull workarounds and protect you against upgrades as well... (when SAP adds a load of stuff because GRC needs it, and then toasts your roles, sets active auths to inactive and adds new ones which are merged automatically...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-15T22:44:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Function group / Function modules approvals</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/function-group-function-modules-approvals/m-p/7270693#M1530065</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have couple of function modules related to RFC / BAPI in QA we need to give approvals before we move them to production. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What precautions do we need to take before approving? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to segregate Function groups / Function modules? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ram&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/function-group-function-modules-approvals/m-p/7270693#M1530065</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T21:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Function group / Function modules approvals</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/function-group-function-modules-approvals/m-p/7270694#M1530066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well you should test function groups and function module coding as per your normal procedures. They are widely used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whether they are accessible depends on your roles, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which release are you on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prior release 7.01 you can only control at function group level with object S_RFC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subsequently you can use RFC_TYPE 'FUNC' to control at module name level if FUGR fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luckily, this check is central and to my knowledge only one developer ever hardcoded it for list outputs, so you should be okay to convert for manual authorizations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For standard ones from the menu, you will need to deactivate S_RFC (there is not option to un-merge, unfortunately..........). Easiest is to get the names from the menu and paste them into the manual authorization, or use a Su24 "dummy" for the role or scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dummy's are usefull workarounds and protect you against upgrades as well... (when SAP adds a load of stuff because GRC needs it, and then toasts your roles, sets active auths to inactive and adds new ones which are merged automatically...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/function-group-function-modules-approvals/m-p/7270694#M1530066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T22:44:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

