<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Code Optimization in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260170#M1528748</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;@Ravishankar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please ask before you recommend something which might be wrong!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOOP AT i_cond &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i_cond is probably very small, no optimization necessary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;t685t is a buffered table, there is no hashed table copy necessary, the SELOECT SINGLE is fine !!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would that there is not performance problem at all, the code was only found be some useless code inspection!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So please analyse before you want to change&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:00:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-07T11:00:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Code Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260166#M1528744</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Master's,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can any one please guide me?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to optimize the following code,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;v_cond = 'MWST'.
perform seg_value using v_cond.
v_cond = 'ZAO1'.
perform seg_value using v_cond.
v_cond = 'ZAO2'.
perform seg_value using v_cond.
v_cond = 'ZAD3'.
perform seg_value using v_cond.
v_cond = 'ZADD'.
perform seg_value using v_cond.
.
.
. It goes like this....

Form seg_value using v_cond_type.
CLEAR: v_frt,int_edidd, int_z1eds02.
  LOOP AT i_cond WHERE  kschl = v_cond_type.
    v_frt = v_frt + i_cond-kwert.
  ENDLOOP.
  CASE l_tcurx.
    WHEN 0.
      int_z1eds02-summe = v_frt * 100.
    WHEN 1.
      int_z1eds02-summe = v_frt * 10.
    WHEN 2.
      int_z1eds02-summe = v_frt.
    WHEN 3.
      int_z1eds02-summe = v_frt / 10.
    WHEN 4.
      int_z1eds02-summe = v_frt / 100.
    WHEN 5.
      int_z1eds02-summe = v_frt / 1000.
  ENDCASE.
  SELECT SINGLE * FROM t685t WHERE spras = 'E' AND kschl = v_cond_type.
  int_z1eds02-kotxt = t685t-vtext.
  CONDENSE int_z1eds02-summe NO-GAPS.
  int_z1eds02-sumid = v_cond_type.
  int_edidd-segnam = 'Z1EDS02'.
  int_edidd-sdata = int_z1eds02.
  IF v_frt &amp;lt;&amp;gt; 0.
    APPEND int_edidd.
  ENDIF.
endform.&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: sai.bala on Sep 4, 2010 2:56 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: sai.bala on Sep 4, 2010 2:58 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: sai.bala on Sep 4, 2010 2:58 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Sep 4, 2010 9:53 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260166#M1528744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-04T09:25:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260167#M1528745</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Optimize in what respect, apart from adding code tags (now done)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260167#M1528745</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasZloch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-04T19:55:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260168#M1528746</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;why do you want to optimize? Is it slow? How slow?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260168#M1528746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-06T10:39:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260169#M1528747</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
 LOOP AT i_cond WHERE  kschl = v_cond_type.
    v_frt = v_frt + i_cond-kwert.
  ENDLOOP.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Define i_cond table as sorted table with non-unique key kschl.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
  SELECT SINGLE * FROM t685t WHERE spras = 'E' AND kschl = v_cond_type.
  int_z1eds02-kotxt = t685t-vtext.
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can make changes as follows&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
Define it_t685t as hashed table with unique key kschl.
clear wa_int_t685t.
Read table it_t685t into wa_t685t with table key kschl = v_cond_type.
if sy-subrc ne 0.
  SELECT SINGLE kschl  vtext into wa_t685t
 FROM t685t WHERE spras = 'E' AND kschl = v_cond_type.
 insert wa_t685t into table it_t685t.
endif
int_z1eds02-kotxt = t685t-vtext
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260169#M1528747</guid>
      <dc:creator>ravi_lanjewar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-07T06:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Code Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260170#M1528748</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;@Ravishankar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please ask before you recommend something which might be wrong!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOOP AT i_cond &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i_cond is probably very small, no optimization necessary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;t685t is a buffered table, there is no hashed table copy necessary, the SELOECT SINGLE is fine !!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would that there is not performance problem at all, the code was only found be some useless code inspection!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So please analyse before you want to change&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Siegfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:00:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/code-optimization/m-p/7260170#M1528748</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-07T11:00:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

