<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MFBF Performance Issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/mfbf-performance-issue/m-p/7191951#M1519958</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check you program with se30 and st05 exactly which statment having problem and execute it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mean while, You can put condition stock &amp;gt; 0 in where condition to avoid the zero record selection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ravi_lanjewar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-13T11:10:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MFBF Performance Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/mfbf-performance-issue/m-p/7191950#M1519957</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gurus,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to improve the performance of the transaction MFBF. We are doing Make-to-Stock REm Backflush.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;During this, its reading the batch stocks and hitting the MCHA and MCHB tables. Batch stock meaterials exists with ZERO batch stock  and due to this MFBF is may taking longer time to execute.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to avoid reading the ZERO batch stock records from batch stock tables?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will really appreciate yuour responses on this performance improvement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MPREDDY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/mfbf-performance-issue/m-p/7191950#M1519957</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-12T15:46:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MFBF Performance Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/mfbf-performance-issue/m-p/7191951#M1519958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check you program with se30 and st05 exactly which statment having problem and execute it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mean while, You can put condition stock &amp;gt; 0 in where condition to avoid the zero record selection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/mfbf-performance-issue/m-p/7191951#M1519958</guid>
      <dc:creator>ravi_lanjewar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-13T11:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

