<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have? in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123960#M1511479</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_ALL is usually not a good idea but it's really convenient &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Definitely check Note 338537 - RFC user authoriz. for data exchange R/3 back end &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; CRM. As it is mentioned in OSS note you can try to build a role for RFC user with limited authorizations. This can be really hard and painful. You need to ask what FMs they need to call from CRM or jsut trace RFC calls from CRM to see what is executed. You can also run trace ST01 to get authorization checks executed in these FMs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at [this wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Security/Best&lt;EM&gt;Practice&lt;/EM&gt;-&lt;EM&gt;How&lt;/EM&gt;to&lt;EM&gt;analyze&lt;/EM&gt;and&lt;EM&gt;secure&lt;/EM&gt;RFC+connections] which is listed in memorable discussions (top thread in this forum). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mvoros</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-28T03:36:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123958#M1511477</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      Our crm gus ask me create a user name RFCUSER in our r3 system. But the gus can not tell me which authorization profile give to this user . So he ask me for SAP_ALL &amp;amp; SAP_NEW . Can somebody tell SAP_ALL is a sound choice? or sap has some special role for CRM integation user in r3 system? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Terry&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123958#M1511477</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T03:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123959#M1511478</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Terry,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As it is new implementation, for RFCUSERS you need to give SAP_ALL / SAP_NEW in dev / QAS systems.. In these cases basis guys wont comprmise. Some time they need more than SAP_ALL.,that can added on case to case  issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User id is unquie id for all the system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123959#M1511478</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T03:27:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123960#M1511479</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_ALL is usually not a good idea but it's really convenient &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Definitely check Note 338537 - RFC user authoriz. for data exchange R/3 back end &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; CRM. As it is mentioned in OSS note you can try to build a role for RFC user with limited authorizations. This can be really hard and painful. You need to ask what FMs they need to call from CRM or jsut trace RFC calls from CRM to see what is executed. You can also run trace ST01 to get authorization checks executed in these FMs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at [this wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Security/Best&lt;EM&gt;Practice&lt;/EM&gt;-&lt;EM&gt;How&lt;/EM&gt;to&lt;EM&gt;analyze&lt;/EM&gt;and&lt;EM&gt;secure&lt;/EM&gt;RFC+connections] which is listed in memorable discussions (top thread in this forum). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123960#M1511479</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvoros</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T03:36:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123961#M1511480</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Thank you for your kindly reply .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     Yes, we can give  SAP_ALL / SAP_NEW in dev / QAS systems. But how to deal with that in our prd system?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     In our prd system  SAP_ALL user is not allowed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Any idea?  Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Terry&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123961#M1511480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T03:37:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123962#M1511481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Terry,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my previuos prj we had given SAP_ALL in prod system(since they were able answer to auditors). Have a discussion with basis guys , client &amp;amp; security team. With approval only you procedure further....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Even martin advice is alo worthy. (iffs /but will always arise from basis guys)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive_macro jive_macro_thread" href="https://community.sap.com/" __jive_macro_name="thread" modifiedtitle="true" __default_attr="1662700"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: sri on Jul 28, 2010 1:53 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123962#M1511481</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T03:54:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123963#M1511482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;isn't the idea behind a 3 system landscape (TST/DEV-QAS-PRD) to be able to test scenarios and develop the fitting solutions before they are moved into PRD?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if you assign SAP_ALL to the rfc-users in QAS you won't have achance to test delimited roles which you should assign in PRD.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There have been already some threads about this question. Please spend your time also to search before you post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also refer to Julius' how-to at:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Security/Best" target="test_blank"&gt;https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Security/Best&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Practice&lt;/EM&gt;-&lt;EM&gt;How&lt;/EM&gt;to&lt;EM&gt;analyze&lt;/EM&gt;and&lt;EM&gt;secure&lt;/EM&gt;RFC+connections&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b.rgds, Bernhard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123963#M1511482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernhard_SAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T05:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123964#M1511483</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note 338537 is a good note for me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:11:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123964#M1511483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T06:11:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFCUSER which authorization should have?</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123965#M1511484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Thanks all for help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    We have decided to trace the needed authorization and create a new role special for the crm connection user .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   And DEV QAS PRD system all using  this way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;terry&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/rfcuser-which-authorization-should-have/m-p/7123965#M1511484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-28T06:14:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

