topic Re: Problem with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Problem with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT

former_member431412 — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:31:04 GMT

I am using the FM BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN. This FM is a RFC. When I execute BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN, I have confirmed that the return information indicates success. When I execute the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT, the FM terminiates witha short dump

Error analysis

A RAISE statement in the program "SAPLCOZV" raised the excepti

condition "DUMP_STATUS_INCONSYSTENCY_FRE".

Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior

program, processing was terminated.

Short description of exception condition:

For detailed documentation of the exception condition, use

Transaction SE37 (Function Library). You can take the called

function module from the display of active calls.

To make this even more confusing, I have a different FM (Not an RFC) that uses the same two FM's with the same data. When I run this FM, I get no error and the update is succesful.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Re: Problem with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT

former_member431412 — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:31:04 GMT

I found the coding problem. Howver, I think SAP should fix the Transaction commit so it handles errors appropriately.

Re: Problem with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT

Former Member — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:54:02 GMT

Can you please elaborate the code you have fixed, as we have encountered similar issue.

Regards

Re: Problem with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT

Former Member — Mon, 25 Aug 2014 07:38:27 GMT

Dear Scott,

Can you please let me know the solution for this issue, i am also facing the same problem for iw21.

Thanks in Advance,

Regards,

Syed Taj

Re: Problem with BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT

former_member431412 — Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:39:08 GMT

There was a problem with the order where one of the phase indicators in AUFK (PHAS0, PHAS1, PHAS2, PHAS3) and AFIH-IPHAS were not showing the same status. I believe in oru case,AUFK-PHAS0 = X(CRTD) and AFIH-IPHAS = '2' (Released)

If your problem is similar, be sure to check JEST to see what status the order is in.

We wrote a program to update AUFK=PHAS* and AFIH-IPHAS to match what was indicated in JEST.

I hope this helps you. feel free to ask more questions if needed

Scott