<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance problem with EDI40 while unicode conversion in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044085#M1501100</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Harshal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;did you already consider to use table splitting for EDI40 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nils Buerckel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP AG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nils_buerckel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-21T09:17:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance problem with EDI40 while unicode conversion</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044084#M1501099</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are doing Unicode migration of our BI 7.0 EHP1 SP 6 system. However we have completed must of the export in 24 Hr. ; but still one R3load job is running since from last 2 days i.e. more than 48 Hr. It is extracting the data from cluster table i.e. EDI40.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As concern to this issue I have checks the SAP Note 872124, 991831, but we are using right R3load version i.e. R7.01/V1.4 Compiled Feb 24 2009 23:50:52. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So please help me to reduce this conversion time, as it is crossing our downtime limit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apart from this I have check the SAP Note 706478, as per note we need to do the archiving of old entries from EDI40 table. But we required following information before we start archiving / deletion of old entry from EDI40 table in source system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.	Do we require these old entries in target system, as concern to normal system option?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.	Is ok if we truncate this table in source system before starting Unicode conversion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following is our system and EDI40 table information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP System: BI 7.0 with EHP1 SP6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Database: MS SQL 2005&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS: Windows 2003&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Database Size : 2.4 TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware information :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CPU : 16 CUP ( Intel 1598 Mhz)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAM : 65 GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDI40 information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Space 20,206.453 MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Index Space 196.289 MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Row count 10567724&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hatshal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:52:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044084#M1501099</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-21T08:52:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problem with EDI40 while unicode conversion</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044085#M1501100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Harshal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;did you already consider to use table splitting for EDI40 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nils Buerckel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP AG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044085#M1501100</guid>
      <dc:creator>nils_buerckel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-21T09:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problem with EDI40 while unicode conversion</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044086#M1501101</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Nils,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I  tried to do the table splitting for EDI40 table but it was taking some much time. So I have cancelled that and started the unicode conversion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But can you please provide some information on following.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.As per SAP Note 706478, if we do the archiving / deletion of old entries from EDI40 table. Then do we need these old entries in target system, as concern to normal system option?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. OR Is ok if we truncate this table in source system before starting Unicode conversion? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Harshal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044086#M1501101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-21T09:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance problem with EDI40 while unicode conversion</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044087#M1501102</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Harshal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please check also SAP note 40088.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. If you archive the objects, they should be available (as display) in the Unicode system as well - otherwise there is no difference to deletion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. EDI40 contains IDocs. As far as I know it, completed IDocs can be important for auditor purposes. Therefore I do not think that it makes sense to truncate this table ! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nils Buerckel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP AG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-problem-with-edi40-while-unicode-conversion/m-p/7044087#M1501102</guid>
      <dc:creator>nils_buerckel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-21T12:49:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

