topic Re: Job Synchronizing using ALE in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Job Synchronizing using ALE

Former Member — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:21:42 GMT

Hi gurus,

please suggest a way : the scenario goes like :-

we have two jobs collectng idocs of two types CODCMT and FIROLL data and sending them from SAP4.7 to SAP ECC6.0.

thru ALE : Application Linkage Enabling

Job frequencies are

in SAP4.7 : the codcmt job runs exactly in the interval of every 15 mins

and in SAP ECC6.0 : same thingh

in SAP4 .7 : FIROLL jobs run exactly every 1/2 hr and similarly in ECC6.0

now they wish to synchronize these jobs . wat meaning should i exactly draw from Synchronization of jobs ?

Can any body provide any clue >>> on this ?

Thanks

Kylie

Re: Job Synchronizing using ALE

Former Member — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:17:07 GMT

I guess, the 2nd job sud have the same frequency as the 1st or vice-versa.

Re: Job Synchronizing using ALE

brad_bohn — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:24:16 GMT


now they wish to synchronize these jobs . wat meaning should i exactly draw from Synchronization of jobs ?

Who is 'they' and why don't you ask 'them' your question? There are several different approaches you could take...

Re: Job Synchronizing using ALE

Former Member — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:50:38 GMT

well pardon me for the typ : 'they'.

It a requirement for jobs synchronization .And such jobs are being used to transfer the data from one SAP System to another

in the frequency mentioned above .

So i was just requesting help :in such scenario . As far as I thought , the jobs now that are running with 15 mins interval can be at an interval of 5 minutes and teh one being transfered with 30 mins interval can be reduced down to 15 mins.

Do we call that job Synchronization.

Thanks

Kylie

Re: Job Synchronizing using ALE

Jelena_Perfiljeva — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:17:14 GMT

The jobs that are running in two different systems cannot really be synchronized. You can adjust their schedule so that they're as close to each other as possible (keep in mind that if, for example, there are not enough resources, the job may be delayed and the other system won't have a clue). Whether to call this "synchronization" or not, that's up to you (or "them" ).

Quite honestly, I would be more concerned with what "they" are trying to achieve than with semantics.