<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BOM transfer through ALE: problem with phantom assemblies in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943124#M1487674</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Suresh!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for my (very) late reply...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, there was an enhancement defined by another IT team that was doing this phantom replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To solve it, I just added a condition about the target system of the Idoc, so that the process is applied or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, it works correctly!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rudy_schmitz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-02T09:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BOM transfer through ALE: problem with phantom assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943122#M1487672</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello SAP experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have configured BOM transfer from one ERP platform to another ERP platform (kernel 701 on both sides), using standard BOMMAT message type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It works pretty good, but the phantom assemblies are not transferred.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, they are replaced by their own sub-components, which is not bad, but we would like to get the exact replication, WITH the phantom assemblies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In WE02, I checked what is sent and what is received on both platforms, and it seems that the "problem" already occurs on the sending platform: in the Idoc, I can't see that the phantom component, but directly its sub-components.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a problem with transaction BD30? Or is it a customizing problem/lack?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your help on this subject.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943122#M1487672</guid>
      <dc:creator>rudy_schmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-03T06:27:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BOM transfer through ALE: problem with phantom assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943123#M1487673</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Rudy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please debug  the outbound function module to verify that the phantom assemblies are being picked otherwise need enhance the FM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suresh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943123#M1487673</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-03T06:35:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BOM transfer through ALE: problem with phantom assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943124#M1487674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Suresh!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for my (very) late reply...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, there was an enhancement defined by another IT team that was doing this phantom replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To solve it, I just added a condition about the target system of the Idoc, so that the process is applied or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, it works correctly!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bom-transfer-through-ale-problem-with-phantom-assemblies/m-p/6943124#M1487674</guid>
      <dc:creator>rudy_schmitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-02T09:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

