<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inner join statement correction in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/inner-join-statement-correction/m-p/6914471#M1483374</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Venkee,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes this query will work but to improve the performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;use the required field names in the order as they are in the table instead of ' * '&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;declare an internal table with this fields. assume gt_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;avoid using into corresponding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Md Ziauddin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-28T13:37:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inner join statement correction</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/inner-join-statement-correction/m-p/6914470#M1483373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For three different tables we can write select statement like below?if any correction pleas correct it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;select *&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    from ekko as a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inner join ekpo as b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      on  a&lt;SUB&gt;ebeln = b&lt;/SUB&gt;ebeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      inner join ekkn as c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       on  b&lt;SUB&gt;ebeln = c&lt;/SUB&gt;ebeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    into corresponding fields of table gt_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    where a~zvoyn in s_zvoyn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and a~ekgrp in s_ekgrp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and a~ebeln in s_ebeln&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and a~zbookref2 in s_bookr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and a~lifnr in s_lifnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and a~waers in s_waers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and b~matnr in s_matnr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      and c~kostl in s_kostl..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/inner-join-statement-correction/m-p/6914470#M1483373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-28T13:00:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inner join statement correction</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/inner-join-statement-correction/m-p/6914471#M1483374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Venkee,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes this query will work but to improve the performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;use the required field names in the order as they are in the table instead of ' * '&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;declare an internal table with this fields. assume gt_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;avoid using into corresponding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Md Ziauddin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/inner-join-statement-correction/m-p/6914471#M1483374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-28T13:37:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

